From theory to practice - page 739

 
Novaja:

This is how my system earns SB, who has any say?



Not bad for a SB! ;)
 
_o0O:

not bad for SB! ;)

Thanks, only the negative deals are there and there are quite a few more.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Well then do two or three more tests. It takes 5 minutes to generate.

Just read up on how to initialise the GSF so that different SBs are available.

I usually do it through the built-in generation function, does it need to be changed somehow?

 

Maybe this is how the equity graph should grow?


 
Novaja:

I do normally through the built-in generation function, does it need to be changed somehow?

Is it this one = FATHER(-1;1) ? Sorry, it's without initialisation.

 
Novaja:

Maybe this is how the equity graph should grow?

Somewhere like this. But if it's on the SB, that's weird.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Is it this one = LOOK(-1;1) ? Sorry, it's without initialization.

No, SLCHIS(), just changing zeros to -1.

 
Novaja:

Thank you, but there are negative trades and quite a few more.

I don't think it's possible to get rid of negative trades completely.

Novaja:

Maybe this is how the equity graph should grow?

that's better))

Novaja:

I usually do it through the built-in generation function, does it need to be changed somehow?

Try doing an "Update" for the table, a new row will be generated
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Somewhere like that. But if it's on the SB, that's weird.

What's weird about it? No drawdown?

[Deleted]  
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Somewhere like this. But if it's on the SB, it's all very strange.

It only seems strange because it contradicts established stereotypes. And yet these stereotypes have been introduced into the minds of the masses through manipulation. There is no proof (of the impossibility) anywhere.