From theory to practice - page 1325

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:

Renat, if you have a formula that reveals trends in time, there is only one thing you are missing)

I think that since you do not post your formulae, I will answer you the same way you answered me: "The formulae are visible to everyone around every corner", including its missing parts=)

no one is posting

look carefully at the screenshot

price moves at different angles in the basement

look at the real movement on the chart

what function should be applied in the basement to determine the target and describe the real price movement trajectory from point to point, including the future one?

it's elementary...

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:

You and I have manna from heaven:

Even Renat doesn't have it (sorry, Renat, but that's true).

Is it okay that he's just a lunatic? Because of this fool, along with Asaulenka, you can't find information here

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:

But Sash, switch from ticks to higher charts and analyse changes in price movements from a smaller scale to a larger one :)

And you still have the problem of general sampling) it shouldn't be static.

I no longer have time to think - the lust for profit clouds my mind. It's like everything is floating in front of my eyes and my ears only hear the coveted rustling of notes.

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

He's just a lunatic, isn't he? That idiot, along with Asaulenka, makes it hard to find information here.

no.

I am sincerely grateful to Renat for at least publishing how he sees the market and the results, and for the fact that he has finally posted a signal.)

I respect everyone who offers not just any charts but a precise reasoning.)

And this is not trash, but "theory-practice-result".

That is essentially what we are trying to get from everyone here.

 
Alexander_K:

I no longer have time to think - the lust for profit clouds my mind. It's like everything is floating in front of my eyes and my ears only hear the coveted rustling of notes.

Sahash... come on, you're such a baby.)

Yes... cool money is good when it lasts. But I see that you are going in the wrong direction with the right thoughts =)

it's just a shame that your thoughts are right and your implementation is wrong...

how come ...

I really wish the market would not let you down...and that you'd be lucky.

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:

No.

maybe just a 70Lvl eloquence, impossible to read

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

If no big players want to buy the instrument, the price will start to fall.

agree

and the market's equity rises until everybody sells out.

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

maybe just a 70Lvl eloquence, impossible to read.

well... not to mention his Formulae)))) there's a whole epic about it))

but it's fun)

(Of course, fun to those who have already achieved everything and who have everything really works, while all the rest is certainly in the way...)

I actually stink at Alexander_K for his crusades in the name of suffering)).

You could write a book about it)).


But they are working on something, achieve something, post the results.

of course, it's 100500% eloquence, but still).

no matter how you look at it, it's a move forward)


e.g. Renat's "market equity")

he seems to take an axis of price movement and trade on a return to the mean price

and the price movement relative to this average is called "equity")))

At least it's not a balance))))


If I give him a hint, his system will actually work. But he'll think I'm not worth it))) well, okay))) let him suffer in this way)))

 
Martin_Apis_Bot Cheguevara:

like Renat's "market equity")

He apparently takes a price movement axis and trades on a return to the average

and the price movement relative to this average is called "equity")))

At least it is not a balance))))

No, you're wrong.

Chehegewara, the thing is that I was afraid to see the lagging indicator until the last moment, that is, to finish it...

I was afraid to be disappointed.

Then put up an ancient picture of myself, today, here.

Then I finished the indicator, today, and it's not lagging!

So the strategy will not be the one on the signal.

Just getting the target now....

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

no, you're wrong

Chehegewara, the thing is, I was afraid until the last moment to see the lagging indicator, that is, to finish it...

I was afraid of being disappointed.

Then I put up an old picture of myself

Then I finished writing the indicator and it did not lag!

So the strategy will not be the one on the signal.

I'll just get the target now....

Rena, everything would work great, but the market won't. Sorry about that.

What you don't understand, and I understand it, is the reason why you are improving your formula every time, even though you said long ago that it's as simple as laundry soap (and then what's there to improve?).

Regards Che.
Reason: