From theory to practice - page 1061

 
apr73:

I am neither a mathematician nor a physicist. I don't understand your words, unfortunately.

My thinking is simple - the price has two directions up and down.

I buy, I sell.

You win, you lose.

It's the reference point that counts.

I'm not a mathematician or a physicist.

Who am? I'm just curious.

We have a distribution.

If a physicist is not in the 20% of successful physicists he goes to the market, and where else can he find a job? You won't get a Nobel Prize.))

It's the same with mathematicians.

You should show some class here. You can tell from your first posts.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

I'm not a mathematician or a physicist.

Who am? I'm just curious.

We have this distribution.

If a physicist is not in the 20% of successful physicists he goes to the market, and where else can he find a job? You won't get a Nobel Prize.))

It's the same with mathematicians.

You should show some class here. You can tell from your first posts.

I'm just a participant in the correspondence.

Sorry if I offended anyone.

 
apr73:

I'm just a participant in the correspondence.

Sorry if I offended anyone.

No hard feelings? A new lease of life to fight an insatiable market.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

What grudges? A new lease of life.

Thank you.

I want to learn how to program and test.

 
apr73:

Thank you.

Have you come to offer something, a new concept for example, or to learn from the experiences of the unsuccessful?

You already have experience in trading. I take it?

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

Have you come to offer something, a new concept for example, or to learn from the experiences of the underdogs?

You already have experience in trading. Is that so?

There is nothing new in this field for many years.

I have some experience on a demo account.

The experience of losers interests me the most.

 
apr73:

There hasn't been anything new in this area for many years.

Whether there is or not, no one will ever tell you the new. Don't even get your hopes up.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
It takes five years, and it's not a fact that it's even possible. Many people quit before that. But it's worth a try, isn't it, Lavrentiy Pavlovich?

I'm not in a hurry, even if it's 15-20 years, it doesn't matter.

It doesn't matter whether it works or not.

What matters is the process of self-learning, it won't go in vain anyway.

 
apr73:

There hasn't been anything new in this area for many years.

I have a little experience in a demo account.

I am most interested in the experiences of unsuccessful traders.

This is the right approach. The main thing is not to step on the rake of those who have already experienced it.

But among the losers there are interesting seeds that can be gleaned, bit by bit, into a big lump of knowledge about the market.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

This is the right approach. The main thing is not to step on the rake of those who have already experienced this pleasure.

But there are interesting seeds among losers, which can be collected by grains into a large lump of knowledge about the market.

I don't think it is possible not to step on it.

The important thing is to learn these rakes and make them your advantage.

Reason: