From theory to practice - page 1058

New comment
 
apr73:

The result cannot be anything, even with 100 throws.

Binomial law will not do.

What has a small but not zero probability is possible. This leads to the fact that by making quite many (sometimes very) throws, any desired subsequence (e.g. 100 tails in a row) can be obtained

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

Only trading results can explain everything. Have you seen his results?

I haven't seen anyone's trading results here.

I'm not interested in them.

I'm interested in why some people say that and others say the exact opposite.

 
apr73:

ButWizard2018 probably did not write his words from scratch either?

You are intelligent and educated but you write that it is not possible.

The other person's opinion is exactly the opposite.

Can you explain it in simple words?

I knew one wizard personally. If it's Zheka - hello)) 2018 I did not know. But there is such a mesag ... It's as simple as a rock. What's accepted without evidence - can be rejected without evidence.

Besides, to argue ... ...even talk. It's not easy to talk to a person. Not a tape recorder... )))))))

 
vladevgeniy:

What is accepted unconditionally may also be rejected unconditionally.


That applies to everyone here.

There are two people whose opinions are completely opposite.

I'm not asking you to prove anything to me.

I want to understand how it's possible.

 
apr73:

That applies to everyone here.

There are two people whose opinions are completely opposite.

I'm not asking you to prove anything to me.

I want to understand how that's possible.

I mean... So-and-so and so-and-so... Damn trolls in the thread)))) it's not like politics......

 
Aleksey Nikolayev:

What has a small but not zero probability is possible. This leads to the fact that with many (sometimes very many) rolls one can get any desired subsequence (e.g. 100 tails in a row).

If I get 100 tails in a row, I can walk to Mars, not just to the moon.

 
apr73:

ButWizard2018 probably did not write his words from scratch either?

You are intelligent and educated but you write that it is not possible.

The other person's opinion is exactly the opposite.

Can you explain it in simple words?

Start on page 686 or so of this thread (mine and Renate's comments), it's all been covered there for a long time now. Some comments have been deleted, either because of intellectual property disclosure, or simply because of a ban, according to the rules of this forum.
I'm too lazy to explain. Honest. Those who need it will find it, and those who don't need it won't).
 
apr73:

By the time I get a hundred tails in a row, I can walk to Mars, not just to the moon.

Perhaps, but this effect would cause any profitable system to lose any amount of money.

 
A system definitely can't) not a system - regularly can... Even an under-system easily...... The market is either ideal - or zero imho)
 
vladevgeniy:

fun on friday )))) The aftar's gone off the deep end.))

Cat's got the cat, he's gone....
1...105110521053105410551056105710581059106010611062106310641065...1981
New comment
Reason: