From theory to practice - page 1055
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Do you think this man is joking ?
The market is a living environment. You just have to adapt to it. The problem is that by virtue of the structure and structure of the market chart, it is unnatural for human nature to act successfully in the market, that is, to trade profitably. The paradox, markets are a product of the human psyche, but humans are totally unadapted to them.It is not even concrete knowledge and experience that contradict it, millions of years of evolution have formed human psyche so that it is very difficult for it to adapt to the process at markets. It is not natural for it.Every cell of the body protests when trading the grail, even after many years. The trades seem to be completely idiotic.
But the more we look at it the better.Robots are written by the same people, with their delusions and transfer their misunderstanding of the process and their "psyche" into the program. It's very hard to really get away from that.
MTS answers the question "What to do?" But to answer it correctly, the person writing the program must understand "what is going on" Shiryaev's question "What process is going on?" is the key one in trading, whatever it may be.
I don't understand anything of what you've written)))))
Do you think this man is joking ?
Artists are the clear favourites on the market, economists and mathematicians have a paltry chance. Radiologists, in the sense of radioelectronics and physicists are 50/50 :) Purely from experience.
...
MTS answers the question "What to do?" But in order to answer it correctly, the person writing the program must understand "what is going on" Shiryaev's question "What is the process?" is the key question in trading, whatever it may be.
This is not the limit, there are better results.
What are you arguing about? )))
What do you mean by "simple games"? You can win at cards if you understand the logic of the game - there are no random events. You can win at football, checkers and many other games, but only if you know the game and have experience.
You can win in the bookie betting - you can calculate there as well, my brother has a friend who is not poor at it.
Simple games are just that, a dime a dozen.
How come there's no randomness in cards? Do you see everything ahead of time? ?
Simple games are just that, a coin.
How is it that there are no randomness in cards? Do you see everything ahead of time? ?
All or everything? So much for the simplification of the letter "e"))
Then you'd better play 6 out of 45.
Simple games are just that, a coin.
How is it that there are no randomness in cards? Do you see everything ahead of time? ?
Sure, they're gone as the game progresses, and there's an opportunity to find out what isn't in the game already, which gives you some advantages.
Then you're better off playing 6 out of 45.
come on... Fuck the coin... Euras is +50 -100 + 250 -50 +50 +50.... Coin makers... welcome to
And also at the end of it, the move is made))))
Not like this.... Oh, no, I'm gonna get a hundred bucks more... And then oops... oops... wrong by two more))))))))))))
Of course, they do come off as the game progresses, and there's an opportunity to find out what's no longer in the game, which gives you some advantages.