From theory to practice - page 742
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is how my system earns SB, who has any say?
There was a topic recently, I don't remember whose it was. It was suggested to take an array of trades of a successful TS or signal from a tester or real, and use them to train the TS. By the way, the idea makes perfect sense.
The fact that the system works on the real market, and not on history - that already says something.
This seems strange only because it contradicts established stereotypes. But these stereotypes have been manipulated into the minds of the masses. There is no evidence (of impossibility) anywhere.
you need to SLAVE(0;1). If 0, then -1. If 1, then 1.
Yeah, I didn't figure out that only integers are output there, until I wrote it in Excel. It's more reliable, though, to deal with float doubles, and make a coin out of them.
the equity of working on the sb is the same sb.
why? :O
With the fact that patterns cannot just appear out of thin air as a result of magical manipulation. They either exist in the original process (and then they can be found), or they do not exist (it is impossible to find something that does not exist).
SB does not contain regularities by definition, hence any derivative of SB does not contain them either.
With the fact that patterns cannot just appear out of thin air as a result of magical manipulation. They either exist in the original process (and then they can be found), or they do not exist (it is impossible to find something that does not exist).
SB does not contain regularities by definition, hence any derivative of SB does not contain them either.
An extremely simple example: we apply MM by martin, are you claiming that equity will turn out to be the same SB with the same characteristics as the original SB? There will be a NEW pattern that didn't exist, won't there?
Again, why would it? (this is a very tolerant analogue of the word s*u*ya*i).
I can, and you can, if you think about it, beat the original SB in a way that Mama Bernoulli would never know.
SB does not contain patterns by definition, hence any derivative of SB does not contain them either.
This is wrong. Draw the MAshka - it is derived from SB, and you will get a lot of regularities. You may build a tester's grail on them at once).
There was a topic recently, I don't remember whose it was. It was suggested to take an array of trades of a successful TS or signal from a tester or real, and use them to train the TS. By the way, the idea makes perfect sense.
A very sensible idea. But we must take an array of deals of a (very) successful trader who trades by himself, without robots and not following a rigid strategy. The market is simply analyzed using available tools and makes decisions.
But this input is hard to find, the probability is about 0 :-) And how to teach TS on it is also unclear.
But you can't find such an input, the probability is about 0 :-) And it's not at all clear how to train the TS on it either.
With or without a robot - it doesn't matter.
How to teach it is clear, but I'm not saying that it's easy. But you will never find it, that's for sure).