Sparring on MetaQuotes-Demo demo accounts - page 113
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I have to take into account that these are professionals, the elite, so to speak. And what about the unprepared masses?)
The more movement, the less retention. This proves once again that as long as it is flat, as long as deposits live, as soon as movements start, deposits start to be wiped out.
There are already 12 participants with at least initial deposit.
We will see how many will reach the finish line.
I don't know why I failed to log in with my username and password.
It's in the archive, it shows on the monitoring page, maybe because you didn't trade, when was the last trade made?
Position summary as of the morning of 19.04.2017 http://mvs.hol.es/Monitoring/
Trading Championship English https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/188046
Vladimir Gorbachev
11 participants trade on mt5, 19 participants trade on mt4 - not a bad proportion for mt5
In general, the situation is rather predictable.
With 31 people, only 13 managed to keep the deposit not less than the initial one, the rest have lost, or are losing little by little.
Here we have statistics that even half of them have not survived until the end of the month, and this is a demo, less than 20% will survive on the real account. How about that!
The metaquotes on the mt4 demo have a crazy spread. And spread sensitive robots are just crying bitter tears))))
The metaquotes on the mt4 demo have a crazy spread. And spread-sensitive robots are just crying bitter tears))))
Good afternoon 20.04.2017 http://mvs.hol.es/Monitoring/
There was a slight change in the top three, Renat Akhtyamov came in third place , moving to fourth place Vitaly Muzichenko, first place is still held by Igor Volodin, the third place is traditionally taken by Sergey Don
- Semyon, I have an ambivalent feeling.... Why is it that when it comes to the shop, the disputers operate ONLY with the parameters: balance and equitability, but when it comes to determining the Winner, these parameters are no longer sufficient. Need a SECOND nomination?
- This is not for average minds, Sarah!
- Semen, and yet, if I come to the shop to buy bread for breakfast, I might not be sold our favourite brick just because I had a drawdown of over 20% ?
- Don't worry so Sarah, they'll sell you anything you want! All that matters is that you have the money! And leave the second nomination to the disputants and don't crap your brains out. :)
Beautifully put.
Now translate it into your native language and tell me what's wrong.
Change what? What do you think is wrong with this calculation? Give me your formulas, maybe they're better. I don't particularly like the current one either, but I can't offer anything of my own.
Sarah, I wanted to earn some bread for you and myself - with some caviar and butter.
When I entered the market up to my eyeballs - I had practically drained EVERYTHING you and I had honestly stolen all our lives - and I remembered about the second nomination.
Sarah - you see, my goodness oh my goodness oh my goodness - I'm a fool, I've really gone into the market and dumped all our money and now our kids have to go to the dump and collect potato peels to make soup for themselves and for us.
Sarah, - it turns out that in this - the second category, a horse that does not run fast but evenly - has a better chance of reaching the finish line...
- Semyon, the debaters just won't let up. If you listen to them, we should be eating breakfast without bread, because my drawdown is often over 20%!
- Come on, Sarah.
- By the way, Semyon, yesterday Izya came by, who always has a drawdown under 20%, and again asked to "borrow till payday." :)
Alexander, what are you worried about? I would trade the first nomination - your incentive, you may be surprised if you are not disappointed with the second nomination.