September registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship is now open - page 23
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
10 trades can be split into parts! This is absurd.
Partial closing of a trade (splitting) is a done deal. Split it into parts
What does this have to do with the number of deals, they can be broken down endlessly! Where is the organiser anyway?
The more trades, the less the effect of chance and the less trading will be like roulette. As already written here, potential subscribers and investors are looking at us (the contestants). Let's assume that two traders are trading. One has profit of +100% and maximal drawdown -10% and the other has the same result. But the first trader has reached the same result within 100 trades, while the second one did it within 2 trades. Which of them the investor will trust more in terms of reliability and stability of trade.
I understand that the word "efficiency" means the ability to achieve the desired result (profit) with the least time and effort, but it, as an indicator, does not exclude the luck factor, which is very common in trading. The number of deals (aka the amount of time and effort spent) will be an indicator of trading stability and at high profits it will be possible to identify really professional traders, rather than guessing the price moves and all-in bets.
All right, I'll take part in roulette, open with a maximum lot and turn the contest into a circus if such conditions and rules are acceptable))
Apparently the circus is not a success )))) 5000% in two days looked good - not everyone can do it ...
The more trades there are, the less the effect of chance and the less trading will look like roulette. As already written here, potential subscribers and investors are looking at us (the contestants). Let's assume that two traders are trading. One has profit +100% and maximal drawdown -10% and the other has the same result. But the first trader has reached the same result within 100 trades, while the second one did it within 2 trades. Which of them the investor will trust more in terms of reliability and stability of trade.
I understand that the word "efficiency" means the ability to achieve the desired result (profit) with the least time and effort, but it, as an indicator, does not exclude the luck factor, which is very common in trading. The number of deals (the same as the amount of time and effort spent) will be a measure of trading stability and in case of high profit it will help to identify really professional traders, rather than fans of guessing the price moves and all-in bets.
To exclude luck we need contests with a long period, at least a quarter
What I want to say - 18 participants have started since the start of the competition (in the past we had at least 40 people), it can be said that half of the participants have lost their deposits (some have already lost everything), some are coming. There are still 12 days until the end of registration - how many people will be registered is unclear - no competition))) There is no competition, and the prizes are easy pickings. What we will do ????
What I want to say - 18 participants have started since the start of the competition (in the past we had at least 40 people), it can be said that half of the participants have lost their deposits (some have already lost everything), some are coming. There are still 12 days until the end of registration - it is unclear how many people will be registered - no competition))) There is no competition, and the prizes are easy pickings. What we will do ????.
Bring the contest to an end. Perhaps there will still be registrations, even those who have already merged.
Bring the competition to an end. There may still be registrations, even if there are some who have already leaked.
It is not possible to register a second time
Bring the competition to an end. There may still be registrations, maybe even those who have already leaked.
The cash prize is not as important as the trophy itself
Bring the competition to an end. There may still be registrations, maybe even those who have already leaked.
Do not start the next competition until you have at least 40 people.
What I want to say - 18 participants have started since the start of the competition (in the past we had at least 40 people), it can be said that half of the participants have lost their deposits (some have already lost everything), some are coming. There are still 12 days until the end of registration - it is unclear how many more people will be registered - no competition))) There is no competition, and the prizes are easy pickings. What we will do ????.
Hold the contest. Definitely!!! (Where does the organizer get such pessimism?)
I don't know who the "prizes are easy prey for, butElena Kukharets will do the assigned tasks, despite the fact that (for some reasons) she starts a couple of days late.
Let it be a handicap for the competitors ;)))