What's new in MetaTrader 4 and MQL4 - big changes on the way - page 46
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Since the beginning. only trading by other symbols is not available.
I understand that this is a crutch... In the current situation, you can ask to add a command for programmed change of spread in the tester. In this case, you can take data from asc symbols and get the desired spread on the fly. And this scenario is quite realizable.
Then it is no longer a software change of spread, but a simple counter in the tester parameters.
Although, as I remember something similar is in the parameters of MT4 tester, and it is called "Spread" (though I do not think it is possible to change the value in the process of testing).
Then it is no longer a software change of spread, but a simple counter in the tester's parameters.
Although, as I remember something similar already exists in the parameters of MT4 tester, it is called "Spread" (although in the course of testing it is not possible to change the value as I understand it).
Tried your true ECN. Didn't work for me for several reasons...
You should implement (since ECN is in your hands) table T&S, I think this approach would give additional client base of those who trade only on traded volumes.
Yes and in general would be on the front line with such know-how, at least I have seen such only on the exchanges (CME.... MICEX/RTS)
For example at LMAX (the first forex exchange, as it is called) there is only fin price without volume - there are rudiments, but it is not enough.
SZZ
I understand that the vast majority of traders have not gained even a basic knowledge of MetaTrader 5 technology in so many years and are asking surprising questions:
I take it ... surprising questions ...
FAQ:
С самого начала. недоступна только торговля по другим символам.
Man, that's a serious and very necessary problem. And those who either do not trade or do not know the essence of it, they are burying it. And on the background of traders, - those who are clever turns out to be much more and it seems to developers that it is not necessary.
AscBid history is just as ineffective as Bid history. The data will still be written only OHLC data, but not divided by time when maximum Ask was reached and when maximum Bid was reached.
You will get twice as much information, but it will be only half percent more useful.
Even if MQ will make your request (which I highly doubt), you will immediately begin to grumble that it's all bullshit, let's use a tick history.
And that's because the tick history really contains a lot of additional information against bars, and for the tick history we need the full storage of Ask and Bid for each tick,
and the bar history almost doesn't change its informativeness if it is stored as AskBid or simply Bid.
AscBid history is just as ineffective as Bid history. The data will still be written only OHLC data, without time dilution when maximum Ask was reached and when maximum Bid was reached.
You will get twice as much information, but it will be only half percent more useful.
Even if MQ will make your request (which I highly doubt), you will immediately begin to grumble that it's all bullshit, let's use a tick history.
And that's because the tick history really contains a lot of additional information against bars, and for the tick history we need the full storage of Ask and Bid for each tick,
and the bar history almost doesn't change its informativeness if it is stored as AskBid or just Bid.