You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
for a week and a half.
cool, congratulations!
going together after a "disagreement" will still go together - did I get that right?
cool, congratulations!
going together after a "disagreement" will still go together - did I get that right?
Not quite. The system exploits the inevitable properties of the law of distribution of market states.
With 4 instruments goes the usual diversification, you can have 1 instrument, 2 instruments, 10 instruments...
Joker - at least give me a rough idea of the method, come on!
Not really. The system exploits the inevitable properties of the law of distribution of market states.
With 4 instruments there is a normal diversification, you can have 1 instrument, 2 instruments or 10 instruments...
I'm not even stinging. IMHO my mathematical explanation:
1. Narrowing of dispersion of difference of increment moduli of market states (no matter of what nature) gives unambiguous probable set of its possible subsequent states.
2. Iterative combinatorial analysis of states allows to narrow the set of states down to the most probable further states.
3. Diversification allows for maximum likelihood results.
I'm not even stinging. IMHO my mathematical explanation:
1. Narrowing of dispersion of difference of increment moduli of market states (no matter of what nature) gives unambiguous probable set of its possible subsequent states.
2. Iterrational combinatorial analysis of states allows to narrow the set of states down to the most probable further states.
3. Diversification allows for maximum likelihood results.