Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 89
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Somebody posted an excel-file, I suspect the author, because in his explanations he used the notion of "spin", which the author knows, and which only professional players know (in casinos for example).
There are one thousand and a half arbitrary states of self-organizing environment, from which the system has selected two hundred deals ( something tells me that 200 is more than 10 ).
I'm not going to prove anything to anyone.
See how it is.... It's easier, without trying to understand it, to trash it and convince others it's trash(((
I am happy for you anyway, evil is two-faced, and sometimes evil does more good than good. A man has done you evil (not about you but about any situation in life).
Somebody may feel bad at heart because of that and the one who did it may have caused another person to think that when I will have an opportunity, I will not do it because I have experienced evil myself.
Thus one evil, even if not much, but a few evil things will happen, this is the circle of good and evil in life. And it doesn't matter whether the waves will reach you personally or other people.
Ok, it's all lyrical.
As for the posts in the Word on the previous page, the man was talking about patterns of Adverza, attributing to it almost the laws of the Universe, but it's much more banal - a regular modification of the Golden Ratio, which is everywhere. Adversa is essentially a pattern of triangles, or modified triangles and their combinations.
So what I wrote about - the difference of modules of increments - it is essentially the same triangles, only + also with a combination of analysis and signs of increments, that is, modules of increments decrease - narrowing triangle in its essence or as on adversa - MC, or at growth of size of modules - extending triangle - on adversa it MR and so on...
PS: I am not alexander. He has hidden this fact to you as could about increments, as the true magician and the gambler having transferred all attention to the secondary and not basic thoughts......
I can not yet say that I have achieved the same as Joker, but still come to this, just slowly at me all this, and to check a lot of time consumes. As proo wrote 2 problems a couple of pages ago, I do not even know which one is more important, but I know that certainly theorists with their boorish tone burning at the stake all dissent, certainly will not describe it through the exact formulae, or do not show.
It's a pity no one has joined the discussion... Well, never mind, let's go on alone ))))) for the first time or what)))) I'll throw in some more soon.
You'd better ask Jokera and the topicstarter to lay out about 10 trading signals :-) and see how many of them will be profitable :-)
You've got your ears hanging out :-)
As for the signals, you better read them, you know they are written as rubbish, they may be a provocation, you better understand that they are not predictions. The basis is different.
PS: I am not alexander. He hid this fact as best he could about the increments, as a true magician and gambler transferring all attention to the secondary and non-mainstream thoughts......
How do you know that he has hidden something, diverted attention, etc.? If you're not him, then you've got some kind of cult there, led by Alexander. It's hard to explain otherwise, why new characters constantly appear in this thread, barely registered on the forum, and from the first posts start desperately defending their teacher.
But why this teacher leaked his demo, if he knows all the secrets of the universe? ;)
I can't say I've achieved what Joker did yet, but I'll get there anyway, it's just slow and it takes a long time to check.
How can you know that he has hidden something, diverted attention, etc.? If you write that you are not him, it means that you have some kind of sect there, led by Alexander. It's hard to explain otherwise, why new characters constantly appear in this thread, barely registered on the forum, and from the first posts start desperately defending their teacher.
But why this teacher merged his demo, if he knows all the laws of the universe? ;)
Sherlock didn't see the crimes either, but he solved them by detailing them by deduction. ))))))
And you don't have to become an electron yourself to know about electrons and judge their behaviour.
And that is, you haven't been to space, have you??? Judging by your logic it apparently doesn't exist......BUAGA
Your speculations about the teacher and other uninteresting conjectures are not interesting..... In case you haven't noticed, my dialogue was not in the thread thread, but in parallel. He about dough, and I about SB.
People like you, even if you bypass everything and bring money home, they will never say thank you ......
PS: And about the constantly appearing characters, so you ask the moderators. You appear sacks in the thread more on a buzz than a variety of thoughts on the case.
And you better read what you have written, you know you have written nonsense, is it a provocation? You understand that it is not a predictive bullshit, there is no prediction, God knows when the signal will be, when it will be, then it will be positive. The basis is different.
As far as I understood from the system, the prediction of previous spins of desired dependence by your system can be synthetically obtained also by combinatorial analysis.
(If you ask me, I won't enter this thread otherwise I feel it will lose its meaning. Who wants to - he will understand. )
But you better read what you've written, you know it's a rubbish, it's a provocation, you understand it's not a prediction, god knows when the signal will be, when it's right it will be right. The basis is different.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry, please.
I was thinking from the ceiling that everyone was looking for an opportunity to BELIEVE.
And if the system can show such wonders in pictures, it must inevitably appear as position cues : direction; volume; position of stops.
Otherwise - no way.
As far as I understood from the system, the predicate of previous spins of the desired dependence by your system can be synthetically obtained also by combinatorial analysis.
( With your permission I will not write in this branch any more, otherwise I feel it will lose its meaning. Who will want, will understand. )
Sherlock didn't see the crimes either, but he solved them by describing them in detail by deduction.))))))