Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 33
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And where is the full version of the state, on what forum? Isn't it here?
PS: Alexander, yo mai libe augustin augustin, yo mai libe augustin ales nicht hin. Granny! Chickens! mleko! eggs! schnelle!
Well, now everything becomes clear. Essentially just a banal cross trade against the trend with outlasting the drawdown. According to the author's idea, he should get out of the drawdown within half a year. Well, well, what a naive man... And it is unclear why two pairs were attached here if their divergence is equal to the cross deviation by some value from its average (MA).
As far as I understand, the author is a trader for whom the equity drawdown is not a drawdown. He or she does not pay much attention to equity. The main thing, in fact, is that the balance is steadily increasing, and the rest is not important)). Even if the deposit is on the verge of sinking - but what a nice balance curve :)
how can the correlation be different for the same similarity of series? Actually, similarity is correlation, and instead of an eye (they are different for everyone) Pearson is used.
ZS. a thought occurred to me, because through conditional entropy it is easy to check the work of patterns, as here with an example "the best worker" _https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Условная_энтропия#.D0.A3.D1.81.D0.BB.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.8F_.D1.8D.D0.BD.D1.82.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.BF.D0.B8.D1.8F
Well, that clears things up now. In essence, it's just banal cross-trend trading and sitting out a drawdown. According to the author's idea, he should get out of the drawdown within six months. Well, well, what a naive man... And it is unclear, why two pairs were involved, if their divergence is equal to the cross deviation by some value from its average (MA) .....
Well now it's getting clearer. In essence, it is just banal cross trading against the trend with overshooting the drawdown. According to the author's plan, he should get out of the drawdown within six months. Well, well, what a naive man... And it is unclear why two pairs were attached here if their divergence is equal to the cross deviation by some value from its average (MA).
In short, as I understood the author is a trader for whom equity drawdown is not a drawdown. He or she does not pay much attention to equity. The main thing, in fact, is that the balance is steadily increasing, and the rest is not important )). Even if the deposit is on the verge of loss, what a nice balance curve it has :)
Oh, don't anger the father without understanding, oh, don't anger...))0
It is not easy there, even because everything is built from the principle of reduction of random variables to regularities.
The matter is that if something happens, we can manipulate pairs, while it will not work with the cross. In addition, the lots are not equal in pairs, so the paired entry is necessary anyway.
This is exactly because of the fact that lots are not equal, and we obtain trading with synthetic cross, which is little different from trading with real cross.
Buy 1.00 EURUSD + Sell 0.79 GBPUSD is almost equal to Buy 1.00 EURGBP. The margin of error is very small.
Oh don't anger your father without understanding, oh don't anger...))0
It's not easy there at all, even because initially everything is built from the principle of reducing a random variable to a pattern, so it's not easy anymore.
So read the first posts there and everything will become clear. Although he explains it very incomprehensibly, but the meaning is clear.
Or Buy 1.00 EURUSD + Sell 1.19 GBPUSD if the pound is currently low volatility against the yen.
Did he say anything about volatility there?