learn how to earn money villagers [Episode 2] ! - page 398
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
:-) from the word go - there equity has not fallen below 25-26000.
1. no - it is optimised automatically and I change it myself - now 24 - 32 pips differently on different pairs.
2. Now the oil gets another bump - and there it is - a parabola :-)
2) Now the oil price is about to go even higher - that's the parabola.
the yen is moving over 1000 real pips.
why do you have bikes on top and sells on the bottom?
It's a hassle...
you should buy cheaper and sell dearer, not the other way roundA very inefficient model, like any martin. The lot increases like an avalanche, while the profit always remains miserable not corresponding to the risks and the margin spent.
why do you have bikes on top and sells open at the bottom?
!it's a hassle...
You should buy cheaper and sell dearer, not the other way aroundbros - selves - it doesn' t matter where and who opens and when :-) there philosophy is as follows: there's a philosophy of Avalanche with step (it's not ILAN (rollback)), if you notice (the expected question), that in the end let's say two robots at 0,48 to the sell and one as a result we have one more robot going to profit with the same volume, then we have one more robot increasing 0.48х2 and once again 0.48х2, but one of them went to profit - as a result those - are reopened in the increased volume - the one that closed in profit.I.e. there is additional margin for those who reopen on bigger ones.
I mean that may be for example two in sell 0.48 - in loss-making and one in buy by 0.92 - in take - as the result those are reopened in increased - and then are closed in take.
This is without antimartin (theme - safe martin).
I'll go to
report
No, it's not that hard- everything goes on there philosophically.
If you want to change the order, you have to add some profits to ones or losses to other ones.
like one lot on volumes is a profit of another one on the same or other volumes (similar, not initial), so they "insure" each other...
in three days.
A very inefficient model, like any martin. The lot increases like an avalanche, and the profit always remains miserable, not proportional to the risks and the margin spent.
No, I'm fine with efficiency - it's not any martin. I wrote about ensembles - read below... :-)
There goes an ensemble of martins, and perhaps the losses of some are offset by the profits of others...
"My point is that there may be two in sell at 0.48 - in loss and one in buy at 0.92 - in take - as a result they are reopened at increased - and also later are taken to take . "why do you have bikes on top and sells open at the bottom?
it's a hassle...
You should buy cheaper and sell more, not the other way aroundAnd why the fuck do you leak once a month?
here are three days
I'll prepare my starter robot today - I'll post my version and set here.
here's the starter version thanks to the developer (this is not an advertisement)
ExpMartin - Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 4
Dmitriy Epshteyn | Russian
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/13532
the philosophy is explained there
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/139975/page396#comment_16961265
I'll post the pip version here, i.e. if someone is interested, look at the instrument and set a third of its daily range - take a 1% better take.
All will form - I will post it here in the morning for MSC - there is a time restriction on entries, only in the afternoon, close - at any time and set start.
Here's an example - the channel SL 310 TP 330 on the pound - works out fine.
why do you have bikes on top and sells open at the bottom?
It's a hassle...
you should buy cheaper and sell more expensive, not vice versaIt's just some kind of neural net ensemble... in +
it's not me and it's not me...
i don't know
yeah dunno - it's the ensemble that needs explaining... :-)
If you want to trade with a robot, you've got a constraint on the time of trade (you can close it after hours) and a constraint on the spread - if it is too big, it won't trade (I made a lot of money with it myself ... :-) )
When it comes to percent of ATP to buy a channel - this robot does not have it yet, so stop - take out targets for a five-digit instrument on your own, based on initial data of instrument movement from ATP - look for yourself and set an opinion - 25-30%.
All description is in the posts above.
Use and enjoy it.
Here are the profit motions
this is channel 210, take 230 pips
here is the EURJPY channel 260, take 280 pips
неделя https://account.forex4you.ru.com/ru/static-statement/58012918dc9040462e09c80b1085f148
Very inefficient model, like any martin. Lot increases avalanche-like, while the profit always remains minuscule not commensurate with the risks and margin spent.
here's the best way, in essence, would you suggest a better way to marshal Gunn (time bidding)? I've tried it - it worked, but somehow I'm not impressed yet....
there it is - efficiency to risk - not impressed... yet... :-) have to do.