valenok2003: Alexey, just now I noticed something inquisitorial in your look.
Thank you, Sergey, at least you noticed. That's exactly what I wanted: it's been two years in the Inquisition, it's about time to match my appearance...
P.S. And I did not notice a bit of inquisitorial in your look.
If a hypothetical 100% efficient trading system is considered a grail, it should eventually swallow the entire market, and replace it with itself.
This is the proof of the non-existence of the grail I hear all the time. Can't you do it without absorbing all the money? Are you familiar with the concept of "enough"?
This is the kind of proof of the non-existence of the grail I hear all the time. Can't you do it without absorbing all the money? Are you familiar with the concept of "enough"?
I am familiar with it, the grail is not, otherwise it immediately ceases to be the grail...
Even if a grail actually exists, it is not certain that it can be found in any reasonable amount of time.
Here is an example for an analogy. Chess is known to be a game with complete information (i.e. with a deterministic move tree). It has been proven that for such games there is always a way to calculate and construct a strategy that leads to a win or a draw. However, this does not mean that anyone will ever find such a strategy - there are too many options.
What to say about the market, where complete information is probably not available.
Even if a grail does exist, it is not certain that it can be found in any reasonable amount of time.
Here is an example for an analogy. Chess is known to be a game with complete information (i.e. with a deterministic move tree). It has been proven that for such games there is always a way to calculate and construct a strategy that leads to a win or a draw. However, this does not mean that anyone will ever find such a strategy - there are too many options.
What to say about the market, where complete information is probably not available.
And also remember the game of Go - it is also a game with full information, but so far only one programme has been able to beat the champion, and the others are orders of magnitude weaker, as I have read. So, it is very difficult to formalise a winning strategy.
alexeymosc: And also think of the game "Go" - it is also a game with complete information, but so far only one programme has been able to beat the champion, and the others are an order of magnitude weaker, as I read.
Where can I read? The most powerful robot I've seen uses a small cluster for calculations and has 5 amateur dunks (pro as far as the sky).
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
There is nograil, for it already exists. I will repeat my IMHO in this thread:
Если считать граалем гипотетическую 100% эффективную торговую систему, то в конце концов она должна поглотить весь рынок, и заместить его собой.
То есть рынок и есть грааль . Так что грааль есть, и в то же время его нет.
И весь этот спор вырождается к курице с яйцом... :)
And the drawdowns will increase from 20% to... 200.
There is no grail, all believers are dead!
(c) Mathemat
Thank you, Sergey, at least you noticed. That's exactly what I wanted: it's been two years in the Inquisition, it's about time to match my appearance...
P.S. And I did not notice a bit of inquisitorial in your look.
...
I always thought that only cologne was TRUE, but here you say that ASH CERTAIN GRAAL is also possible??? :-)
If a hypothetical 100% efficient trading system is considered a grail, it should eventually swallow the entire market, and replace it with itself.
This is the proof of the non-existence of the grail I hear all the time. Can't you do it without absorbing all the money? Are you familiar with the concept of "enough"?
This is the kind of proof of the non-existence of the grail I hear all the time. Can't you do it without absorbing all the money? Are you familiar with the concept of "enough"?
I am familiar with it, the grail is not, otherwise it immediately ceases to be the grail...
Even if a grail actually exists, it is not certain that it can be found in any reasonable amount of time.
Here is an example for an analogy. Chess is known to be a game with complete information (i.e. with a deterministic move tree). It has been proven that for such games there is always a way to calculate and construct a strategy that leads to a win or a draw. However, this does not mean that anyone will ever find such a strategy - there are too many options.
What to say about the market, where complete information is probably not available.
Even if a grail does exist, it is not certain that it can be found in any reasonable amount of time.
Here is an example for an analogy. Chess is known to be a game with complete information (i.e. with a deterministic move tree). It has been proven that for such games there is always a way to calculate and construct a strategy that leads to a win or a draw. However, this does not mean that anyone will ever find such a strategy - there are too many options.
What to say about the market, where complete information is probably not available.
And also think of the game "Go" - it is also a game with complete information, but so far only one programme has been able to beat the champion, and the others are an order of magnitude weaker, as I read.