You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I guess not to walk in the rain without boots!
ZS: tomorrow I will suggest shooting, no better to feed him with dried fly agarics - though I'm probably too late, then I'd better teach him how to use fly agarics properly
Don't be overly humane. Execute. imho.
I guess not to walk in the rain without boots!
ZS: tomorrow I will suggest shooting, no better to feed him with dried fly agarics - though I am probably too late, then I'd better teach him to eat fly agarics properly
The flycatchers are spotted birchberries. About the shooting, let me get this straight.
We said we'd sleep...
The flycatchers are spotted birchberries. About the shooting, let me get this straight.
We said we'd sleep...
You mean keep an eye on the broom?
Sorry, you don't have to wait. I changed my mind :)
You mean keep an eye on the broom?
Whatever you're comfortable with... Sorry to bother you....
P.S. Too bad you changed your mind...
P.S. 2
I'm not going to argue about anything... I respect your age... Respect you so far for that. All the best.
I join with Andrew. Like others, too, want to hear from you something sweet and tasty.
Peter, there's a thread where you were constructive about context (for those not in the tank, it's "In Follow-Up"). The thread is great - but that's precisely because there was a lot of construction there. Give us something like that here too, to make everyone shudder. Remind me of the beginning:
...
:-)))
Alexey, by the "context" of Peter's holding the branch it is clear that there WILL NOT BE KARNAVAL // M. Troll.
All has already been explained in his previous, fresh posts, IMHO.
P.S. Enough shaking already, it's time to chop the profits.
:-)))
Alexei, it is clear from the "context" of Peter's branch that there will be NO CARNAVAL // M. Troll.
Everything has already been explained in his previous recent posts, IMHO.
You are right, but not IMHO, but imho
You're right, but not imho, but imho
see here... :-)))