TA or something you don't know about. - page 103

 
Peter_Zabriski:

This is an indicator. Don't make me angry. I am writing his full description.


Interesting fading front. Separate for the up and down pulses.
The start, I suppose, is here.

 

Peter, thanks for the idea.



There's still a fade front to work with. The algorithms are all yours.

 
sv.:

Peter, thank you for the idea.



There's still a fade front to work with. The algorithms are all yours.

What algorithms? Where is the code?
 
Roman.:
What algorithms? Where is the code?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9284
Feed the MACD to the filter input, with separate edges for up and down pulses.
 
О! Thank you. I'll have a look.
[Deleted]  
[Deleted]  

Yes. Sorry. I will write a description of the indicator after all. It's just (making excuses) it's been really hard for me to do. Been - busy.

But I couldn't resist responding to the bullshit. What a load of rubbish!

[Deleted]  

Description.

From afar. Actually, it's strictly... ouch, okay. Let's say I have a market theory, and those who haven't understood it, they have understood something else, and they're cutting the cabbage on it. Really, I don't know anything about it. Which is not surprising. Who, pray tell, will flaunt their abnormality? )))

So. If you look at the timeline of that

[Deleted]  

Here it is. Last subwindow. Description.

No. The principle.

We take the MACD. Detect, i.e. calculate its modulus on a sufficiently long segment. We assume that it is volatility.

Then... We take the MACD peak values, say, 2/12, and postpone them modulo. We obtain a smoothed for several hundreds of bars general idea about volatility.


[Deleted]  
This is a technical layout. Realistically - three or five values should remain. I'll think about it...