TA or something you don't know about. - page 108

 
By the way, my noise control... Too lazy to hunt. Rather - I'll post a new one. It's unlikely to be much different from the shiny original, so the fifth digit, didn't it count. I mean, it's the fifth digit that pisses me off. If it's detected, it's multiplied by 10. I mean, you can always set the level in four digits. What for? Well, liquidity, of course. But why would it take so long to move the price on a lamb? Isn't it hard to do, like in Quick? It's not patented, as far as I know... Press the shifter and dozens...
 

It's the same:

Now! I won't distract you - do you think you've found it?

I don't even want to say what. - you know.

(smiling broadly) You're such jerks!!!

 

It's a strange thing.

If it's a new one, it's a theme!

Here's a squeeze, it wasn't bad there.

I'm laughing already: Look at the first page - wasn't just there...

What's the point of repeating it - for idiots? Yeah. I guess...

 
Sorry, but I don't cut no ponces. Brats! Fuck you all.
I'm talking shit. Come on, check it out again: // What is TA?
Technically, it is a market analysis on the basis of data received by the exchange terminal.
I.e., it is usually a standard price formula for a bar (OHLC), volumes and ticks (only ticks for Forex), open interest (for options), the cup, current volumes of supply and demand for the instrument and some others, which will not be considered here.
These, as you will say, are already known. Not really. There are two main frictions with the public here:
1. Many people only call TA what is included as indicators in theirtrading terminal. But, say, neuro-systems are not. Or, for example, FFT makes people feel that they have looked beyond what is provided to them for observation.
Or TA only what was pre-19X. Archaeologists, my ass.))
No. The definition is perfectly clear. TA is anything that uses your terminal's quote stream for analysis, which requires no linguistic parsing.
No news, no predictions from rabid analysts on CNBC, RBC and other porn channels, no opinions from forum authorities etc.
2. Another point, which is more likely from illiteracy (just do not know the meaning of the word - analysis). TA is understood by some as a system of predictions. This is CATEGORICALLY not so!
Let me explain. The tools of analysis exist not to predict, but to understand what is happening and what a skilled observer can do about it. Now here is what to do.
Examples. The thermometer, speedometer, caliper are all analytical tools and they in no way guarantee you : reaching thermal death, increasing penis size and reaching 2nd cosmic speed.

So - let's agree at the outset! - To say that TA doesn't work is to sign away your complete inadequacy and trolleymania. // I don't believe the ruler's readings!!! )))

===

Please think before you post. I can do bad things.

 
Peter_Zabriski:
TA is anything that uses your terminal's quote stream for analysis that does not require linguistic parsing.


Be careful with the piercings....
 
paukas:

Watch the piercings.....

Ah-ha-ha!

Are you an idiot?

No. Me, more like. Hell, what do you expect from someone like that? Nothing.

I'm the idiot. Amen.

 
Countdown.
Apparently, yes - I'm being harsh. It's strange to see a matrix where everything could have been normal, ah - no! Creepy and delirious.

It's not clear why a godlike individual would be so misanthropic. But zero is out. Why?

Here's a thought! But I was wondering... - what do you think?

(This has everything to do with TA - it will be clear from here on)

 
Peter_Zabriski:

Ah-ha-ha!

Are you an idiot?

No. Me, more like. Hell, what do you expect from someone like that? Nothing.

I'm the idiot. Amen.


No - I am, the only thing I know is that the pig-saurus is alive! (and that's enough!)
 
Ishim:
No - I am, the main thing I know is that the Swinosaurs are alive! (and that's enough)


Well, yes. In full agony of consciousness.
But what a misalliance!
 
And for all your manner of addressing the community, you still resent being banned?
Reason: