Don't tell me then that TA doesn't work - page 13

hrenfx  
Reshetov:
Figured it out on the whole.

Posted an EA last night, didn't comment right away. I've never written NS, so my amateurish bicycle:

  1. Weights are first normalized so that |X[1]| + |X[2]| + |X[3]| + |X[4]| = 1. During optimization X[i] can take all values from the interval [-1, +1].
  2. Parameter Smoke <= 1.
  3. In the perceptron the price data is given as relative returns: D[i] = Open[(i - 1) * shift] / Open[i * shift] - 1.
  4. Before calculation (implicitly by code), the price data(D[i]) is normalized so that |ResX| = |X[1] * D[1] + X[2] * D[2] + X[3] * D[3] + X[4] * D[4]|= 1, and there is always a set of weights {Y[1], Y[2], Y[3], Y[4]}, |Y[1]| + |Y[2]| + |Y[3]| + |Y[4]| = 1, for which |ResY| = |Y[1] * D[1] + Y[2] * D[2] + Y[3] * D[3] + Y[4] * D[4]| = 1 (maximum possible).
  5. The signal strength Res = X[1] * D[1] + X[2] * D[2] + X[3] * D[3] + X[4] * D[4] is compared to Smoke: |Res| < Smoke - CLOSE, Res >= Smoke - BUY, Res <= -Smoke - SELL.

With this scheme there is a possibility to go from (+1, -1, 0) to MM, because Res is an implicit position volume. I will make such variant later.

Igor Makanu  
hrenfx:
During optimisation X[i] can take all values from the interval [-1, +1].
  1. Parameter Smoke <= 1.
If you don't mind, please tell me how to perform optimization for your code, I don't have time to understand it, but I'd really like to take a look at it, thanks.
[Deleted]  
IgorM:
If you don't mind, please tell me how to optimise your code, I don't have time to look into it, but I'd really like to take a look, thanks.

Here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/131739 explains it all - Reshetov's first post.

In the same thread Reshetov simply offered a program to automate the process described here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/131739.

Apparently people were too lazy to understand it here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/131739, so the man tried to clearly demonstrate

The real efficiency of this process https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/131739.

Yuri  
It's really like you can't change the testing period, it starts in August and that's it.
Олег  
yuripk:
It's really like you can't change the testing period, it starts in August and that's it.

Is there a history of quotes?
[Deleted]  

Ну и дела !

I took Reshetov's Expert Advisor and processed/optimized it using Reshetov's program on the period 2010.08.22 - 2011.02.22

I ran the Expert Advisor through the parameters obtained using this optimization on the period2009.01.05-2009-12.31, with an initial deposit of 1000 and 0.1 lot:

And I have not inserted or corrected anything anywhere !

Strategy Tester Report
gold-dust
Alpari-Demo (Build 226)

SymbolEURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period1 Hour (H1) 2009.01.05 00:00 - 2009.12.30 23:59 (2009.01.05 - 2009.12.31)
ModelBy open prices (only for Expert Advisors with explicit bar opening control)
Parametersx11=197; x21=19; x31=190; x41=79; x12=86; x22=66; x32=193; x42=43; p=51; sl=630; pass=3; lots=0.1; moneymanagement=0; risk=0; mn=888;

Bars in history7113Modelled ticks13222Simulation qualityn/a
Chart mismatch errors0




Initial deposit1000.00



Net profit1892.60Total profit17280.60Total loss-15388.00
Profitability1.12Expected payoff3.64

Absolute drawdown129.60Maximum drawdown962.14 (26.06%)Relative drawdown28.96% (600.02)

Total trades520Short positions (% win)267 (54.68%)Long positions (% win)253 (52.96%)

Profitable trades (% of all)280 (53.85%)Loss trades (% of all)240 (46.15%)
Largestprofitable trade61.80losing transaction-65.40
Averageprofitable deal61.72Deal loss-64.12
Maximumcontinuous wins (profit)9 (555.90)Continuous losses (loss)6 (-385.51)
MaximumContinuous Profit (number of wins)555.90 (9)Continuous loss (number of losses)-385.51 (6)
Averagecontinuous winnings2continuous loss2
artikul  
more:

I have not inserted or corrected anything anywhere!

How was it? ))) Do you like it? )))
[Deleted]  
artikul:
How was it? ))) Do you like it? )))
So far I'm in shock ! Don't know what to say. Apparently there are adjustments to some universal patterns going on.
artikul  
more:
So far I'm in shock ! I don't know what to say. Apparently there are adjustments to some universal patterns going on.

I'm shocked too )))) Probably because TA doesn't work after all ))))
Reason: