Don't tell me then that TA doesn't work - page 17
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
"You have to make it look good" is chatterboxing. That is pretty much what you are suggesting. No specifics, nothing at all. Again, general words, nothing more.
If you do not understand it, it does not mean that it is talkology ;)) For those who are in the tank))), a simple example of one way to increase statistics. Let's take not only the last 9 months, but for example 10 consecutive sections of 9 months each (thanks to 8 years of history available to all)))). At each site we conduct the "Reshetov's procedure". Add up transactions in all OOS and we have instead of several dozens of transactions a few hundred, which is much more reliable in terms of verification of the method, and its specific application. By the statistical characteristics of the resulting curve with a significant number of trades it is possible to distinguish the SB from the real statistical advantage (with an acceptable probability). Especially for implementations (timeframes and systems) where the spread has a significant impact.
It's not hard to figure out how to implement the other methods either :) And of course, it's better that the OOS is to the right of the fitting areas rather than to the left.
And once again, for whom it may be necessary: for those who trade practically and who are interested in the real application of these methods in trading. For theorists, who are only interested in beauty of implementation and thoughtless twitching of the tester, it is certainly not necessary ;)
For tankers in honour of the Holiday:
The location of the OOS does not say anything about preference, as any location of the OOS is equal. It makes no difference whether to trade left to right or right to left.
Take a sliding window (let it be the same 9 months) and sprinkle "sand". All the OOS are added up. Resulting upwards is fine, otherwise not.
Obviously on SB the resultant will be in a horizontal channel (not including the spread).
For tankers in honour of the Holiday:
The location of the OOS is in no way indicative of preference, as any OOS location is equal. It makes no difference whether to trade left to right or right to left.
Take a sliding window (let it be the same 9 months) and sprinkle "sand". All the OOS are added up. Resulting upwards is fine, otherwise not.
Obviously on SB the resultant will be in the horizontal channel.
Sorry, but learn the basics. The SB will not be in any horizontal channel. If any formal boundaries can be defined, they will be divergent straight lines. Range expansion is proportional to the square root of time.
And there is a difference between the OOS locations too, but not for theorists ;)
Do I understand correctly that this method improves the quality of the input. The quality of the output is not improved and remains the same as before, since
is determined by the parameter sl, which is in the optimization on interval section1+section2.
"Practitioners" can do this experiment and see that the sum of the OOS on SB will be a horizontal channel (not including the spread).
What is the difference between the OOS locations in this "crossover" method?
"Practitioners" can do this experiment and see that the amount of OOS on SB will be a horizontal channel (excluding the spread).
What is the difference between the OOS locations in this "crossover" method?
for example a bunch of nagenerino SBs with the same distribution
Where do you put the horizontal channel here? :)
There's another thing to put in here... read carefully again: "the amount of OOS on SB".
You have taken random increments, not random values. But in spite of that you can also add up all your curveballs. Then you get a channel too.
There's another thing to put in here... read carefully again: "the amount of OOS on SB".
You have taken random increments, not random values. But in spite of that you can also add up all your curves. That's when you get the channel.