Is there a need for a lock in MT5? - page 15
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Exactly. And for that we - as payment - have been promised permission to use loki in secret. )))))))))))))
Totally in the hole and it's not funny, it's what they call genocide in a social context. I have a whole system based on opening open perpetual positions and martingale, it's not exactly star-studded, but it's 500% net profit in 7 months. What do I do now? 1.5 years of development and testing. A cat's tail.
It's hard to find an option, when fitting that in a 10-year stretch, with parameters like that,
Under a million bars, countless ticks. Hard to find parameters that would give 0 losing trades. Luck is also unlikely.
////////////////////////////
Symbol
You have had 300% profit for 10 years ??? trade about 1 per month on M5 ??? put a shawarma stall for this money all the more useful.
I do not want to fake it, but you do not have to fake it:
////////////////////////////
Symbol
... I have a whole system ... in 7 months, 500% net profit. What do I do now? 1.5 years of development and testing. It's a dead end.
I'm guessing with this kind of profitability, the development has already paid for itself?
Now you can sell them to Goldman Sachs for example.
LOCs are embarrassing - no profits!
(y) mah :)))
I guess with such profitability the developments have already paid for themselves?
Now you can sell them to Goldman Sachs for example.
There's enough of our own.
In principle, everything is clear, if the new people (I mean opponents) will not say anything constructive, the topic can be closed, as long as the unfounded not to let and paste, those who do not use loks and can not do it, hammering me that type - ".Man this is you do not need ", nothing is said, all my convincing examples, including an example with a drawing from a real trade has not said anything sensible, it all smells like some kind of delusion, looking-glass. Actually it is a common disease of forums. Giggling, twisting, flubbing, etc.. There are few serious people and even fewer of them speak out.
In principle, everything is clear, if the new people (I mean opponents) will not say anything constructive, the topic can be closed, as long as the unfounded not to let and molding, those who do not use loks and can not do it, molding me that type - ".Man this is you do not need ", nothing is said, all my convincing examples, including an example with a drawing from a real trade has not said anything sensible, it all smells like some kind of delusion, looking-glass. Actually it is a common disease of forums. Giggling, twisting, flubbing, etc.. There are few serious people and even fewer of them speak out.
On a previous page, the following was stated-
I apologize, I have not read the whole thread; I want to join the opinion that locs are very necessary. >> Because the market is really not symmetric and the strategy can take this into account.
Ideal name for your branch
In principle, everything is clear, if the new people (I mean opponents) will not say anything constructive, the topic can be closed, as long as the unfounded not to let and molding, those who do not use loks and can not do it, molding me that type - ".Man this is you do not need ", nothing is said, all my convincing examples, including an example with a drawing from a real trade has not said anything sensible, it all smells like some kind of delusion, looking-glass. Actually it is a common disease of forums. Giggling, twisting, flubbing, etc.. There are few serious people and even fewer of them speak out.
Here's a picture for you :))
Here are two examples, in the form of stats, where lock is of direct benefit. I can go on and on. Not to mention that any not very wide lot(up to a hundred pips in EUR) can be handled and gain, while a position closed in minus is a minus.
>> Locked in minus position is equal to closed in minus. See Equity.