Offtopic: Trader! If you trade forex, on the real, ... - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
All who trade on the Internet with DCs, and there are no others on this forum, (especially for 3 years) should understand that they are the same traders in Forex, as Rambo in the video game "kill red".
You can play and win.
Is there any difference between money earned/displayed through the "forex gambling ride" and money earned/displayed on "forex"?
All who trade on the Internet with a brokerage house and there are no others on this forum (especially 3 years) should understand that they are Forex traders, like Rambo in the video game "kill red".
Do you prefer to work directly on the stock market and really trade?
And why do you measure the level of loss and net profit by different measures? Is it to confuse someone? :)))
Why would I want to confuse anyone? By different measures, because that is the essence of a conservative system - don't lose first and the rest will come with it. If not to lose, then where will the system go but to earn? :)
There are aggressive systems, aimed primarily at capital growth. Usually the risks in these systems are rather high. But in any case they are secondary compared to the main goal - to make money. Have you seen Anton Trefolev's PAMM account? Here it is, an ultra-aggressive system. But it is that very rare case when the manager managed not to offend any investors. I don't like this style of trading at all, but it was beautiful nonetheless.
The ratio of risks to profits can vary a lot, but it's all about whether we focus on risk or profitability.
Kitchen. Who can argue with that.
("The air is nicer in the kitchen..." Dog Heart, M.B.)
I think it was more of a happy accident with a good ending. Luck + knowledge and experience. As they say - he who does not work is unlucky )))). At least a second run at this subject has not yet succeeded. But it was beautiful, I agree....))))
Why would I confuse anyone? By different measures, because that is the essence of a conservative system - don't lose first and the rest will come with it.
I'll say it again. :) You measure the level of loss as a percentage and then you measure the net profit in pips. I don't see the point. Why?
Got it, coaster. OK, let's assume that the MM is still geometric. The point value is chosen so that it is equal to 1/10000 (one ten-thousandth) of the current equity. The stop loss is equal to 30 points on the four digits. Therefore, the loss when the stop loss is triggered is 0.33%.
Suppose now the system trade expectation is ... well, let us say, 8 points. The system makes 100 trades a month, i.e. the profit in pips is 800. So, it makes about 8% of the deposit per month.
What do you think this system is: conservative or aggressive?
Fine, let para. 1 be interpreted exactly as you suggested. I didn't think anyone would have anything to say about point 1. 1. Could you give at least a rough answer to the last intimate question of my first post? You could do so in person.
I'm only interested in the number of transactions up to a million quid and nothing more.
Yes, but hardly anyone could do that (10 trades each doubling the deposit).