Paper "AMERO" will replace the dollar by spring!? - page 63
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
)))))
And here is the view of an American who moved to Russia
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/talking_point/newsid_7928000/7928848.stm
Apparently you have a hypothesis (not a theory) which, before becoming a scientific theory, must stand the test of facts and not necessarily be accepted by anyone. But you still do not want to state its essence. Give at least an example. Moreover, since you have a model (of what?), maybe it will be suitable to illustrate the correctness of the hypothesis. At the input we set some input information, for example, characterizing today's crisis (or another historically known situation), at an output we receive a forecast of consequences and compare it with the historical facts. There is no verifiable (and verifiable) prediction - there is no theory (adequate model). But if everything is confirmed, I suppose it will not be necessary to wait long for the practical application. :-)
Let's not argue about what I got. :-) This argument has no sense.
And I'm not going to say it here, I've already written why. If I see fit, I'll post it in some more effective way.
Obviously, you are related (or experienced) in the field of natural sciences. That's where you "set" on the input and "get" on the output. Economics and finance are a different matter. A pure experiment, as well as a mental experiment, is impossible here, because of the huge number of agents, the difference, including confrontational, of their interests, the mobility and often unpredictability of their reactions to events or each other's actions, etc. Forex is a good example, but extremely primitive. There is only one output parameter, which is either up or down. And no one can do anything about it. What about the world economy or finance ?
A good theory explains the events which have taken place in history and makes certain assumptions as to its future course. It can also give recommendations about what makes sense to do and what not to do. But these are all qualitative things. No quantitative predictions, as well as temporal ones, are possible in this field. And the only way to check them is to live them in reality and see what happens. However, even this does not tell us anything. The implementation of theoretical recommendations is done by governments that are not at all concerned with the interests of testing the theory, and real forces come into play, each pulling in its own direction. Therefore, such implementation will always differ to a greater or lesser extent from that suggested by the theory. Needless to say, this can completely change the consequences of an experiment ?
What can you say about, for example, Marx's theory judging by the results of the construction of socialism in the USSR ?
Or another example. What would you say about the currently accepted economic theory in the developed countries, based on their experience of economic development and the current crisis?
)))))
And here is the view of an American who moved to Russia
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/russian/talking_point/newsid_7928000/7928848.stm
the topic has already been covered:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoZ0stPq0Fw
the topic has already been covered:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoZ0stPq0Fw
This should be shown to those who introduce the American educational system into our schools. The Unified State Exam. = coaching for tests and that's it. There's a young person in the video who didn't get a really good education. None in their 40s. Most likely a compilation of dumb answers (editing). I do not think that young people who studied in the USSR never heard of Heroshima and Nagasaki.
You should have asked the same questions to both Americans and Russians for the sake of the experiment. And look at the statistics. + The sample should be representative.
My link is about something else. About skeletons in the wardrobe.
I don't think anyone who went to school in Soviet times has not heard of Heroshima and Nagasaki.
Dad, how do you spell "x-surgeon" or "x-surgeon"?... Well, that depends on which doctor ;)....
Sorry, couldn't resist ....
Dad, how do you spell x-surgeon or x-surgeon?... Well, that depends on which doctor ;)....
Sorry, couldn't resist ....
It's OK. Thank you. You should always try to write without mistakes. I apologize. I've never been much for literate writing. I'm not a humanitarian. Word has completely corrupted me. And then Igot this new keyboard, It's great, I love it. Except it's even harder to type. I'm still getting used to it.
http://www.media-tech.ru/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=81
If you publish it, don't forget to post the link here too.
I don't feel like discussing Marx's theory instead of yours. And, indeed, the natural sciences are closer to me than the artificial ones. And the modern "generally accepted" theory does not exist, but the results, as they say, are evident. So, don't waste your time with publication, something has to be done about it. :-)
The interesting thing is that this debt does not depend on internet connectivity. Which, quite understandably.
Just because you cut the connection to the internet doesn't make the US debt any smaller, does it? :-))