[WARNING CLOSED!] Any newbie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't go by. Can't go anywhere without you. - page 28
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Faced with a problem:
I wrote a BBP MA Oscillator indicator
It works fine on the chart,
But when I call it from the EA the data does not match.
The set parameters are respectively the same.
BBP_0=iCustom("EURUSD",60, "BBP MA Oscillator",BBPPeriod9,MODE_SMA,SignalBBPPeriod9,MODE_SMMA,0,0);
The question is how it is possible?
I've discovered an interesting feature now...
(it's probably already described somewhere, but I try to use my brain first and then a textbook ;)))
Which allowed me to use one more IF type selection criterion (filter)
Besides a common, traditional IF filter that selects the necessary orders,
introduction of the condition in the code above has selected orders with a profit less than 1.
*
I don't even know if this is correct or not, but it seems to work...
Faced with a problem:
I wrote a BBP MA Oscillator indicator
It works fine on the chart,
But when I call it from the EA the data does not match.
The set parameters are respectively the same.
BBP_0=iCustom("EURUSD",60, "BBP MA Oscillator",BBPPeriod9,MODE_SMA,SignalBBPPeriod9,MODE_SMMA,0,0);
The question is how it is possible?
and if by default
BBP_0=iCustom(NULL,0, "BBP MA Oscillator",0,0);
and this is obviously wrong
it should be
JavaDev, Granit77 thanks for the answers..... and although I still didn't get the answer to my main question, I decided to read the tutorial further. Perhaps the answer to my question will become clearer in the process.
...and although I still didn't get an answer to my basic question, I decided to read the textbook further. Perhaps the answer to my question will become clearer in the process.
I hope SK. is not watching this thread, so I will "share what I've read" in the tutorial. As a normal dumb user, I just skip the incomprehensible parts in the hope that "it will sort itself out". Your question didn't even occur to me (age, you know...). For internal use it was accepted that int is everything that can be counted on fingers, and double - everything else. :))
I hope SK. is not watching this thread, so I will "share what I've read" in a textbook. As a normal dumb user, I just skip the obscure parts in the hope that "it will sort itself out". Your question didn't even occur to me (age, you know...). For internal use it was accepted that int is everything that can be counted on fingers, and double - everything else. :))
Bravo!!!
It was a pleasure to giggle. I don't get the questions either.
Just in case, I'd add my neighbour's fingers.