[WARNING CLOSED!] Any newbie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't go by. Can't go anywhere without you. - page 755
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
WinXP, SP3, Pentium 4 2.8 dual core, 1 Gb RAM.
I have almost the same:
CPU - Intel Pentium D 915 (2.8 x 2)
RAM - Kingston DDR2 667 PC2-5300 4 Gb (2 x 2)
MB - Gigabyte 945P
SVGA - Sapphire Radeon 1650PRO 512MB
HDD - Seagate 400 Gb
OS - Win XP SP3 32bit
As you can see only the RAM is fundamentally different, maybe not enough?
I insert the first line into Start() function:
Sleep(1000*60*(timeframe+1)*1000);
where timeframe = 240 and the test results in the tester are the same as without it. What is the reason?
What did you want to achieve as a result?
If I have calculated correctly:
1000*60*(240+1)*1000 = 14,460,000 seconds.
Do you want the tester to stop at every tick for 167 days ?
I already told you about pausing of processes several pages ago.
I have almost the same:
CPU - Intel Pentium D 915 (2.8 x 2)
RAM - Kingston DDR2 667 PC2-5300 4 Gb (2 x 2)
MB - Gigabyte 945P
SVGA - Sapphire Radeon 1650PRO 512MB
HDD - Seagate 400 Gb
OS - Win XP SP3 32bit
As you can see only the RAM is fundamentally different, maybe it's not enough?
I have a little over half of it at maximum (~600 MB).
Usually 400-450 MB.
As you can see only the RAM is fundamentally different, maybe not enough?
With the first option, if return is removed in the first block, does it not work either?
Thank you very much! It works as it should!
I'm having a bit of a slowdown, people are working out in the cold at night or something :)
I've noticed too, pages take 7~10 seconds to open.
And how does mt use swap file? Maybe there is a problem there?
Well, here's the picture I have.
Paging file is 2 Gb, of course with 4Gb RAM, it is loaded only by ~4% (purple bar on the system monitor), RAM is respectively loaded by ~28% (brown bar).
I apologise for repeating myself, but I'd really like to get to the bottom of this...
Here's the action I'm taking:
I run through the array, which records the date of formation of the max/min of the ZigZ and the value of that max/min.
I need to figure out, in fact, which vertex of ZZ is a minimum and which one is a maximum.
To do this I compare the next highest point of ZZ to the previous one.
If the consecutive top is larger, then it is a top.
if it is smaller, it is a trough.
Depending on whether it is a vertex or a trough, we add 1 or 2 to an element of another array, respectively.
But then Alert displays only 0 instead of 1 and 2.
I am curious about this, WHERE the error could be!!!!
I apologize for repeating myself, but I'd really like to understand...
Ilya, I'll have a look, but I don't quite understand why arrays have string type?