is there something wrong with the service?

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

When you try to select a developer as the implementer, a 404 page appears.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Why isn't the service working?

[Renat Fatkhullin]

It's our mistake.

We'll fix it on Monday morning.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Renat:

It's our mistake.

We'll fix it on Monday morning.

Thank you for your promptness.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

By the way, a suggestion (this may have already been made):

A lot of people agree to bypass the service just because they don't use webmoney or paypal, it would be more convenient if there were more ways to deposit money: yandex-money, rbk-money, through a bank, etc.

[Renat Fatkhullin]

sanyooooook:

By the way, a suggestion (this may have already been made):

Many people agree to bypass the service only because they do not use webmoney or paypal, it would be more convenient if there were more ways to deposit money: yandex-money, rbk-money, through a bank, etc.

My experience shows that it is not about deposit systems.

In addition to webmoney and paypal, there is an almost universal method via credit cards. And there are no commissions at all.

But we will increase the number of input systems. Most likely it will be Moneybookers and Yandex-money.

[Aleksey Rodionov]

I think QIWI is the best option.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Renat:

My experience shows that it's not about input systems.

In addition to webmoney and paypal, there is an almost universal method via credit cards. And there are no commissions at all.

But we will increase the number of input systems. Most likely it will be Moneybookers and Yandex-Money.

The absence of user-familiar input-output system can greatly affect the decision of the user to use the service.

(my opinion) Many people will not use the service if there is not something

(my opinion)Many people will not use the service if there is not something that they are used to, it is "easier in the Internet to find something similar" (I've seen it), but with a convenient system of input/output

Webmoney is not available to everyone, credit cards are not available to everyone, and Pipal has recently started working with Russia (if I'm not mistaken).

I think the path of money to the service should be the shortest and least time-consuming.

Zeleniy 2012.06.03 18:18 #

I think QIWI is the best option.

Yes, kiwi as a variant is very convenient, but yandex is the same thing

[Andrey F. Zelinsky]

sanyooooook:

The lack of a familiar to the user input / output system can greatly affect the decision of the user to use the service.

(my opinion) Many people will not use the service if there is not something

Many will not use the service if there is not something that they are used to, it's "easier to find something similar in the Internet" (it happened), but with a convenient input-output system

The Job service is, above all, security of cooperation (pre-payment blocking, arbitration).

WebMoney, Pipal + credit card are enough to cover 99% of customers, and there are also exchange offices in the Internet.

Who these input/output means are not enough, they will be constantly missing some payment systems.

[Alexandr Bryzgalov]

Service is service, but what about versatility?

The service stopped temporarily and two out of four people paid with me-money

Exchangers: how often do you use them? Are you happy with the commission?

ZS: you offer a lot of good conditions in the profile, but for what purpose? the customer does not expect from you initially that, but still you offer it, because you think it may affect the choice of the customer of your services.

[Renat Fatkhullin]

The issue of non-use of official services is usually rooted in the psychological attitudes of participants, including a general lack of trust. Although other reasons are publicly voiced.