Gentlemen site developers - please write correctly in Russian - page 8

[Rashid Umarov]

marketeer:

Mr. Stringo, stop talking nonsense! Your Russian sounds like Tatar.

Please do not be rude. Slava (stringo) never allows such remarks, neither on the forums nor in person. Otherwise you will be temporarily banned. The topic should be closed, we will take into account all the opinions expressed, the design and functionality of the site are constantly being improved.

[[Deleted]]

Rosh:
Please do not be rude. Slava (stringo) never allows such remarks neither on forums nor in person. Otherwise you will have to be temporarily banned. The topic should be closed, we will take into account all the opinions expressed, the design and functionality of the site are constantly being improved.

I think the topic should have been covered as early as the 3rd pag.

Although if all requests will be taken into account portal will only benefit (in my opinion).

[Victor Kirillin]

Elephant population +1.

Fly population -1.

[Yedelkin]

Rosh:
Тему необходимо закрыть, мы учтем все высказанные мнения, дизайн и функциональность сайта постоянно улучшаются.

Technical note: once again, please note that the "basement" link to the article How to write an EA or indicator has the wrong address -https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/117

[DDFedor]

It is up to management to decide on the current controversy. But it is obvious that the higher the status of the company, the product, the representativeness, the stricter one has to treat the things that form the company's image. A product is no longer a thing used by 'narrow specialists'. A product reaches a level where the "masses" start to take an interest in it. This dispute does not look good for anyone. The most constructive suggestion, in my opinion, is to make an enquiry to the appropriate independent organizations, capable of understanding the current issue, to dot the "i's" of the situation. If this is not done, and no official decision is made, the issue will be raised from time to time and spoil the working mood.

[Yedelkin]

DDFedor:

... to make a request to the appropriate independent organisations capable of understanding the current issue to dot the i's of the situation.

Judging by the reform initiated by the Ministry of Education, they will consider even my "expertam", "robotanam" and "indicatoranam" correct :):):) And will even consider approving them in the next handbook :)

I apologise for repeating the thought, but it's easier, in my opinion, to stick to the usual/standard/trivial rules, and refer to those very rules (which every schoolboy should know) when controversial issues arise.

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

marketeer:

HOW TO WRITE AN EXPERT OR INDICATOR

What is the right way to do it?

HOW TO WRITE A ROBOT OR INDICATOR

or

HOW TO WRITE ROBOT OR INDICATOR

It would also be interesting to argue with a miner about the stress in "dobycha" and with sailors about the stress in "compass".

A better compromise would be:"Expert and IndicatorSpelling Guide ", "Expert and Indicator Ordering Instructions".

[Yedelkin]

Integer:

It would also be interesting to argue with a miner about the stress on the word "dobycha" and with sailors about the stress on the word "compass".

A competent miner would answer: in the mine it's dObycha, in the world it's doYcha. It's the same with sailors. :)

[Vladimir Gomonov]

Yedelkin:
A competent miner would answer: in the mine it's dobycha, in the world it's doobycha. It's the same with sailors. :)

So where are we? In the abstract "world" or at the forum of programmers? :)

[Aleksandr Matveev]

stringo:

Gentlemen connoisseurs of the Russian language, the Russian language is very versatile, and it has many more exceptions than other languages. And there are far more exceptions than you can imagine. The knowledge taken from a school Russian language textbook is not exhaustive.

Here, for example, is a quote from D. E. Rosenthal's Handbook on Spelling and Stylistics: "When animate nouns are used to refer to objects, there are two forms of the accusative case. Cf.: to observe an artificial earth satellite, to launch a new satellite - to launch new satellites(in professional usage). Only: Jupiter has four satellites."

And don't, please, twist things around by attributing exaggerations, hyperbole and the like to us "make the table", "corrections in the expert". What's incomprehensible about the phrase "writing an expert"? Ah Russian grammar is broken? Are you sure? Are you sure about that? Can you prove it?

Go and study MQL5 better...

The correct way to write it is to launchnew satellitesand Jupiter hasfour satellites, if Jupiter is a planet and a satellite is also a space object, but if Jupiter is the name of an animate person and therefore satellites are also people, then the way you wrote it.

Everyone has a different idea of what the Russian language should be, including Rosenthal, who was born in 1899, and Russian came a long time before him... And initially all structure of language was subject only to a clear logic and unified rules, exceptions were and still are words borrowed from other languages, which do not change when written or are subject to any special rules, as in all other languages - words borrowed are not subject to declensions of the language into which they were borrowed.

Everyone can write his reference book and other works and everyone who reads his book will say that he wrote so and so is probably correct, but it is better to proceed from the original concept and ideas of language formation, then everything falls into its place.

You might as well put out a handbook of "Albanian" used on the Internet, and everyone will be referring to it, saying, look, it says so, so that's how it's written, so that's how it's right.

It seems to me that this argument can go on endlessly and everyone will have his or her own opinion on the matter...