Errors, bugs, questions - page 2868
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, the developers' logic is understandable, but for me, I'd rather specify u'y' explicitly when and if I need it
It's just not clear how the char type is defeated.
but this way:
What difference does it make?
Compilation error:
but this way:
What difference does it make?
It seems that only "(type) value" is a type conversion, but "type (value)" is a kind of initialization, which in your case can't return anything. Haven't opened μl for a long time though ))
In µl, only "(type) value" seems to be a type conversion, but "type (value)" is a kind of initialization, which in your case can't return anything. Haven't opened μl for a long time though ))
So openhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/basis/types/casting
Unit: Conversion of numeric types."Explicit type conversion is written as follows"... further in the text
So openhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/basis/types/casting
Yeah checked it out too, I remember coming across this a long time ago about what I wrote above. I apologise for the wrong information).
Compilation error:
but this way:
What difference does it make?
Yes, this is also a compilation error
The developers' logic is quite clear but, as for me, I'd better specify u'y' clearly when and if I need it
I don't understand this logic. When there is a total optimization everywhere and everywhere, and reduction of resources as a priority,
why make the basic character type in Unicode increasing it to 2 bytes.
Hence the mql string type turns out expensive.
Really, it is better to have an additional specifier u'sh'
char by the ghost of the type is only substituted.
But in this case we have a difference of types.
It's a real mess with this Unicode.
Yes, this is also a compilation error.
You have a syntax error - give us an example of working code with (typename) in brackets. You might as well write (OnStart) in brackets, too
Another example of questionable MQL compiler message:
what does #endif have to do with it - and how do you guess where the error actually is?
at the time C++ informs about the error
I hope mql developers are reading this page.
When will you guys make a normal validator?
There is a bug in validator for mt4. It's impossible to get open/close price, Hi/Low candles data from other timeframes.