1200 subscribers!!! - page 26
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Since, in my opinion, everyone reading this thread, it seems that the most knowledgeable about the quality of signals is user abolk,
I will ask him to evaluate the quality of a signal.
I have one signal (excuse me for writing his name, I know it is a violation) "Betrending".
He has a history of less than 2 months (not enough for evaluation), but believe me, it will be very informative.
I also noticed that the account is in euros, so the amounts (losses and profits) are a bit less than if the signal was in dollars.
i'll write my evaluation in a couple of hours and i'll have answers to many questions.
perhaps this signal violates some rules of the service,
so i'll ask the service management not to remove / disable this signal at least a couple of days
p.s. i made screenshots of all pages just in case
Perhaps this signal violates some service rules,
I would ask the service managers not to remove/disable this signal at least for a couple of days.
From this statement, it immediately became clear what was meant. A five-second history check only confirmed the result.
The man had subscribed to a signal. He turned on the copier to another account, which he posted as a provider's account. The usual practice.
ZS I will say even more. Some people open many accounts and subscribe (not only in Signals, but in other similar services) to one of the interesting Signals. All those accounts are transferred through MQL-copiers to a "diversified" multisignals account, which is a provider of signals services. I do not see anything criminal about it. There are legal PAMM accounts for a long time, but they cannot be offered as another PAMM due to the peculiarities of PAMM accounts. With the Signals there is no such limitation. So it is quite logical.
there is one Signal (sorry for writing his name, I know it's a violation) "Betrending". it needs to be evaluated.
...
Perhaps this signal violates some rules of the service,
the provider of this signal subscribed to your signal and started rebroadcasting it - what is the violation of service rules?
Signals service rules:https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules-- what clause of the rules did he violate?
p.s. Although, there is point 3.6"It is forbidden to create a new Signal on the basis of an existing one in the "Signals" service".
...
I'll say even more. Some people open many accounts and each one subscribes (not only in Signals, but in other similar services) to one of the interesting Signals. All those accounts are transferred through MQL-copiers to a "diversified" multisignals account, which is a provider of signals services. I do not see anything wrong with that.
I confess that I myself thought of using the service that way, but not even so much for reselling as for creating a basket - it is a pity that the Signals service does not allow to sign everything at once to one account.
I confess that I myself thought about using the service that way, but not so much for resale as for creating a basket - it is a pity that the Signals service does not allow you to sign up all at once for one account.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
1200 subscribers!
Renat Fatkhullin, 2017.01.18 17:57
In the next two weeks there will be big changes in the service.
The provider of the signal has subscribed to your signal and is rebroadcasting it - how is it a violation of service rules?
Clearly stated in two places:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules#part_IV
An account that was previously subscribed to a Signal can be used to create its own Signal not earlier than one week after the end of the subscription. Resale or free retransmission of Trading Signals is prohibited.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules#part_VII
Explicitly stated in two places:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules#part_IV
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules#part_VII
Yes, I also noted this aspect:
p.s. Although, there is clause 3.6, "You may not create a new Signal based on an existing Signal in the Signals service."
There are plenty of signal services. You can subscribe to Signals, and relay them to other services. And vice versa. In this case, there will be no violation.
By the way, if you compare both signals, you can see that slippage is either absent or minimal - I haven't checked everything in details.
This can be easily explained