
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
All you know, 90 percent of those writing in this thread, do not copy, are not
I have some interesting information that I think will answer many of the questions asked here. ...
What's the precedent? We are not discussing in this thread a clear violation of service rules.
We are collectively reflecting on the development of the service. Somewhere in the example of the existing precedent with subscribers.
Someone copy your signal and write to Service Desk and solve their problem. Why should you make it public? All the more so your "removal" certainly violates the rules of the forum.
p.s. My opinion - retransmission of another signal should not be prohibited.
Taras, I am shocked, are not you ashamed, found a scapegoat. I would not even be surprised if the signal is blocked, but the admins do not see a number of left signals in the top 20, because there is no evidence. The main thing is that the profitability of the robot is not so high that it does not depend on the market and the profitability of his trading robot.
Explicitly stated in two places:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules#part_IV
https://www.mql5.com/ru/signals/rules#part_VII
...Why can't it be that it was bought by several people, working essentially for the same broker. Then it should be forbidden to sell products in more than one hand.
What is the precedent? We are not discussing a clear violation of service rules in this thread.
We are collectively reflecting on the development of the service. Somewhere in the example of the existing precedent with subscribers.
Someone copy your signal and write to Service Desk and solve their problem. Why should you make it public? All the more so your "removal" certainly violates the rules of the forum.
p.s. My opinion -- rebroadcasting another signal should not be prohibited.
It's very funny to read your comments here, comrade! IMHO, it really is you who is choking on bile the most.
And most importantly, so many pounces on the provider of the signal under discussion)) While completely ignoring your own unsubstantiated and stupid statements.
But... go on, amuse the crowd!)
Because it requires exactly the same robot settings and exactly the same quotes, the probability of both of those factors coinciding for two different accounts tends to zero.
I have 10-20 signals to keep them out of the top too, it all resembles a strategy to mislead subscribers.
And if ALL signal strategies are different - why not?