You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The priority in calculating the rating is given to the number of subscribers, this is a key indicator. It would be strange to put a hen laying golden eggs for MQ at the end of the list.
This is not true, in the signals on MT5, who in the top almost all have 0 subscribers. I don't know why I am not subscribed to MT5.
The seller with the maximum number of subscribers is in the first place by MT5 signals.
this came up literally today -- and before that it was just as Petros described
The seller with the maximum number of subscribers is in the first place for MT5 signals.
Top doesn't mean #1. You have to look at the top 10.
Isn't it strange that many signals have gains below 100%, with high drawdown (above 30%), with low performance, in the top.
You were told (and I can confirm) that with the same number of subscribers and loss of trading history, the rating instantly falls, and not just a few.
what kind of signals are more reliable and of higher quality?
I had a 44% drawdown when the yield was 20% per month...
at a yield of 10%, the drawdown holds less than 10%
Top doesn't mean #1. You have to look at the top 10.
Isn't it strange that many signals have gains below 100%, with high drawdown (above 30%), with low characteristics, in the top.
Take signals by 4 and sum up the number of subscribers on 1, 2...n- page.
Perhaps you will see a correlation.
and what makes you think that this number of subscribers affected the place in the ranking?
I told you (and I can confirm it) that with the same number of subscribers and loss of trading history, the rating instantly falls, and not just a few.
what kind of signals are more reliable and of higher quality?
I had a 44% drawdown when the yield was 20% per month...
at a yield of 10%, the drawdown holds less than 10%