Discussion of article "Why Virtual Hosting On The MetaTrader 4 And MetaTrader 5 Is Better Than Usual VPS" - page 64
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Here is the exact time log:
GN 0 17:25:13.366 Virtual Hosting '7170129': selected 'Unionpay' payment system, server: MQL5 New York NY4 35, company: MQL5.community,. server ID: 211, tariff: 5, price: 65.00 $
RN 2 17:31:43.142 Virtual Hosting '7170129': error with payment system Error occured
Rules of virtual hosting: III.2. One leased terminal can work only with one trading account of the user. - https://www.mql5.com/en/vps/rules#part_III
Yeah, now.
In these rules it is written:
"A single trading account can be used on several Virtual terminals. There are no limitations on this parameter."
TRANSLATION: One trading account can be used on several virtual terminals. There are norestrictions on this parameter .
But how to connect this trading account to several terminals - nobody on the planet Earth knows.
And the support service is silent on this matter.
So make conclusions after that, how much this particular VPS is "better" than all the others.
I believe the answer would be to use multiple MQL5 Community accounts, one for each MetaQuotes VPS, but that would be a violation of the Terms and Conditions — #12.13. The User shall use only one unique MQL5 ID on the www.mql5.com website.
(This post was originally written in English with links to the English section.)
Perhaps when using this VPS there are some other footnotes in small print?
Where can I read them?
Neither in the description nor in the advertisement of this service I did not see any text about this limitation.
Perhaps when using this VPS there are some other footnotes in small print?
Where can I read them?
The question has been removed.
The integrated VPS server for MetaTrader 5 is terrible. Every now and then it wakes up disconnected and doesn’t reconnect on its own.
I paid the $15 thinking it would make my trades more reliable, but I was sorely mistaken.
At one point I used the free AWS service and, despite having to put up with aRAM-hungry version of Windows and a paltry amount ofRAM, it was infinitely more stable and reliable, plus I could access it remotely from my mobile and configure my EA if I needed to.
The developers should post a warning on the VPS stating that using it could cause losses and headaches for the customer, but despite this, they market it as if it were far more stable than any other method, complete with graphs explaining the low latency (who knows how they measure that, as it certainly doesn’t seem to be the case).
I strongly advise against using this; I’m going to cancel my subscription and never use it again!
From time to time, it switches off and does not reconnect automatically.