Discussion of article "Grid and martingale: what are they and how to use them?"
"You don't like cats? You just don't know how to cook them..."
You have to think, networks are also a tool.....
I agree with the author - pending orders have a significant disadvantage: at the moment when the price reaches the level of this order, the dynamics can be any.
Besides, the probability of forecasting on the Forex market (as well as on the stock market) according to calculations is not 50/50, as many people think, but about 12%, which is fully confirmed by the official statistics of the number of successful traders (from 5 to 15%).
Therefore, the author correctly emphasised the use of orders of different types, the use of grids and martingale.
- www.mql5.com
"You don't like cats? You just don't know how to cook them..."
You have to think, networks are also a tool.....
Of course it's a tool, no one's arguing. Predict a powerful movement in any direction and everything will work. I see you have a working grid in your products. That's good. I haven't decided on the signals yet, the maximum I have is accumulation, but I tried to detect it, but it doesn't work very well.
Of course it's a tool, no one's arguing. Predict a powerful movement in any direction and everything will work. I see you have a working grid in your products. That's good. I haven't decided on the signals yet, the maximum I have is accumulation, but I tried to detect it, but it doesn't work very well.
Сделаны общие математические выводы, которые позволят новичкам, да и думаю не только им, максимально продуктивно использовать свое время при разработке собственных торговых систем.
I saw neither conclusions nor the description stated in the title of the article. No rigorous proof. What I saw was a very superficial and rambling presentation of the author's "mathematical" discoveries.
It is a pity that such "articles" fill the site fund.
I saw neither conclusions nor the description stated in the title of the article. No rigorous proof. What I saw was a very superficial and rambling presentation of the author's "mathematical" discoveries.
It is a pity that such "articles" fill the site fund.
about discoveries nobody said one, superficial presentation is a necessity for understanding two, summarised presentation is my personal presentation. If you can write a more complete article, I would read it. There are no secrets here for me though. If you are looking for mathematical discoveries here, you are wasting your time, you should be a mathematical theorist. The purpose of the article is to give a general idea, abstract, mathematical and practical to prove the theory. Everything has been presented. And the fact that you didn't see the conclusions is bad. Perhaps you should read more carefully, especially what is highlighted in bold.
"Grid and Martingale: what are they and how to use them?" - It is not written how to use them. The conclusion is that grids are draining, and this is not news anyway.
Pyramiding is also a grid, but it does not drain when used correctly
"Grid and martingale: what are they and how to use them?" - It is not written how to use them. The conclusion is that grids are draining, and this is not news.
You should understand that the article is not only about the grid and martingale, but about the conclusions that follow from the application of these strategies. As I understood no one understood why this article was written, it is sad. Apparently, this topic should be covered in more depth.... I think a lot of people did, but even more did not understand. I was trying to convey the commonality of the two strategies, not just describe how they work. Of course, I understand that all of you are smart, some of you are even smarter than me, but I was not trying to get ahead, I was trying to make the maximum number of people understand the material and draw conclusions. Not everyone is so knowledgeable and enlightened. The material is not perfect, but not useless. If there is something to challenge, I am ready to accept the inconsistency of my thoughts, but something tells me that I will not have to. And about how to use them, it's actually written at the very end. The question is not in this, but deeper in fact, whether it is worth using them at all is the main question, although it is not a question, but an answer already rather
Published the article Grid and Martingale: what are they and how to use them?
Author: Evgeniy Ilin
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
New article Grid and martingale: what are they and how to use them? has been published:
In this article, I will try to explain in detail what grid and martingale are, as well as what they have in common. Besides, I will try to analyze how viable these strategies really are. The article features mathematical and practical sections.
The order grid was created with the aim of making profit in any market. It does not matter whether it is falling or growing, if the market features a clearly visible movement, then, according to the idea, the grid opens orders using a clever order opening system so that in total these orders gain enough profit at some point to close them all at once. Let me show this in the images below:
Author: Evgeniy Ilin