Discussion of article "Grid and martingale: what are they and how to use them?" - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Speaking of pyramiding, it's all the same, there are similarities with the grid, the grid also tries to eat up more movement, but in pyramiding and in the grid, you need to know the beginning of the impulse, in what direction is not important. It's all the same. You can just open two positions towards each other with short stop losses and distant profits, and the same thing will happen, only you will pay less spread than in a grid or pyramiding, and these are your grids and pyramiding, you just give more money to the broker and that's all.
"You could just for that matter open two positions facing each other with short stop losses and distant profits, and the same thing would happen.... "
Taken out of context."Short stops will work much more often than a far profit" - tell me the multiplication table.
Google has it all, you just have to be lazy to look for it. Pyramiding is the same eggs but in profile, as they say. I have enough experience to say that without even checking.
The "experience" of profanity is evident. That is why in the article about the net-martin - only about draining, and not a single reasonable thought about how to reduce the drawdown.
The "experience" of profanity is evident. That is why in the article about the net-martin - only about draining, and not a single reasonable thought about how to reduce drawdown.
I don't understand where do you get such clever people from? To reduce drawdown you need to find a good signal first. There are reasonable thoughts, who wants to see will see and read them. You have not understood anything from the article and why it was written at all. If you are too lazy to read and understand it carefully, especially since there is not much to read here at all. No one will lay out their grails on a platter for you here. One smart guy told me that what you write about martin and netting is a drain, I wrote an article about netting and martin, the next smart guy is not satisfied that I wrote the truth. DDD
I don't understand where do you get such clever people from? To reduce the drawdown you need to find a good signal first. There are reasonable thoughts in general, who wants to see will see and read. You have not understood anything from the article and why it was written at all. If you are too lazy to read and understand it carefully, especially since there is not much to read here at all. No one will lay out their grails on a platter for you here. One smart guy told me that what you write about martin and netting is a drain, I wrote an article about netting and martin, the next smart guy is not satisfied that I wrote the truth. DDD
It is very difficult to call this opus an article. DDD
Martingale: Lot = k * Lot. As a result Depo = n(k) * Depo.
Grid: Lot = ksum * Lot, where ksum = k1+ k2+ k3+ ... ,ki are the grid levels. As a result Depo = n(ksum) * Depo.
Changing k from 0 to the value that the deposit and broker allows, we watch how Depo changes and draw conclusions accordingly to the state of our wallet and readiness to risk.
That's the whole article with a title like the author's. Even EXCEL is not needed - a notebook in a cell is enough. But the author went the other way: "why do simple when you can do complicated". The question is WHY... -)
To call this opus an article is very difficult. DDD
Another Gordon Freeman. You are outraged without knowing what you want. Not a single comment on the essence of the question. You don't even understand what the article is about, even though it is written in the simplest terms.
Martingale: Lot = k * Lot. As a result Depo = n(k) * Depo.
Grid: Lot = ksum * Lot, where ksum = k1+ k2+ k3+ ... ,ki are grid levels. As a result Depo = n(ksum) * Depo.
Changing k from 0 to the value that the deposit and broker allows, we watch how Depo changes and draw conclusions accordingly to the state of our wallet and readiness to risk.
That's the whole article with a title like the author's. Even EXCEL is not needed - a notebook in a cell is enough. But the author went the other way: "why do simple when you can do complicated". The question is WHY... -)
With all due respect, you also have not understood anything about why the article was written. It's much simpler than I made it. Here tell me what is the ultimate purpose of the article in your opinion ? From this we should start from. It is clear that most people have practical experience in applying these algorithms. All you're doing now is just saying, "I know everything." Like I know it all and I've been through it all. I still counted on a more inquisitive audience, not showing off.
With all due respect, you also didn't understand anything about why the article was written. It's a lot simpler than I made it. Tell me, what is the ultimate goal of the article in your opinion? That's where we should start. It is clear that most people have practical experience in applying these algorithms. All you're doing now is just saying, "I know everything." Like I know it all and I've been through it all. I still counted on a more inquisitive audience, not showing off.
It's just that your first article was over the top, and this one was expected.
and plus the topic is "slippery" - everyone here considers himself an expert in martingales and grids :-))
so there are plenty of haters.
---
perhaps you should have shown the similarity to the identity of "nets", "martingale" and "pyramiding". And that these techniques work only in the presence of a trading signal, without it they are all a gift to DC.
But then the article would go away from the side of mathematics - but so just a practical review.