Discussion of article "Grid and martingale: what are they and how to use them?" - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's just that your first article was over the top, this one was expected to be the same.
and plus the topic is "slippery" - everyone here considers himself an expert in martingales and grids :-))
so there are plenty of haters
---
perhaps we should have shown the similarity to the identity of "grids", "martin" and "pyramiding". And that these techniques work only in the presence of a trading signal, without it they are all a gift in the direction of DC.
But then the article would go to the side of mathematics - and so just a practical review.
Well, I just tried to make it as simple and short as possible. I'll add more about pyramiding here. I purposely didn't want to make it too complicated and stretch it out for everyone to understand. Probably should have done more and more detail. I'll have to find time for that, you're right. By the way, there's a section on similarity in general maths. It's the most important section actually. There the formula shows that these 3 strategies are just special cases of this formula, and that any combination or hybrid of these systems is also a system that fails in the absence of a signal. The formula is simple, but it answers all the questions of those who understand it.
The last reply to the last comment made me sad. Don't try to pull out a " weak" project, write a new one better. And comments on the article are categorical statement that netting and martingale are unprofitable strategies. Many people do not like it, hence the negative criticism. In general, the article is not bad, but it is better to leave the final conclusion about the researched strategies to the readers.
I don't mind comments, but I can't leave unanswered those comments that are not objective, and even more so those comments that are just heath based on nothing. I knew a lot of people wouldn't like it, that's why I wrote it. I don't aim to be liked, I write the truth. Especially since it is backed up by both theory and practice. I have every reason to write such articles because it is a real experience and not some abstract bullshit. I would not write such an article just for fun. Write, make comments, I read everything. Your last comment upset you, I can understand that, but you have to understand it is not an attempt to twist things around, it is just a response. I will not allow you to write any rubbish here (by the way, the last comment from Maxim was more than objective). And there will be more articles. They will be more interesting and useful than the previous ones, just not all at once. Plus I can't post my intellectual property here, only limitedly. No guarantees
I use the grid strategy in trading to buy stocks, indices, and crypto. The essence of the strategy is that when the price goes down, the asset is bought at a lower price, i.e. less money is needed to increase the volume of the position, therefore, when the price moves to long, the profit significantly outweighs the invested funds.
Too vague for me, from your words I understand that countertrend (waves in other words). Wave strategies work, the grid has nothing to do with it. The point is that the more the price goes down the more likely a pullback and vice versa. This article uses the assumption that the price movement is unpredictable from the word "unpredictable" to make people understand that without a signal it will all give zero mathematical expectation. The grid is sharpened for the trend according to the classics. If it's flat, it's trouble. In general, for these reasons, there are so many strategies of all kinds of original. There is no clear strategy in general access that would allow everyone to win. Martins and grids are one of the variations of crowd misinformation. The market makes money on the crowd. So does pyramiding, by the way. Any of these variations is destructive to the crowd. Someone will be lucky and he will write how he is a market nagibator, and someone will write that all this is rubbish and I lost everything in 1 day. For me it's just statistics. In general, the crowd will always lose because they are the crowd.
Yeah. I'll put in my five cents ... As an apologist of Martingale, the founding father of the netters - I will say simply - "You just do not know how to cook them".
A simple application of martin should show a picture like this.
and if you make flips with martin on the grid - the profitability can be up to 10.000% for 1 trading month ... learn the material ... baby...
learn the ropes... baby.
Okay, baby. How many trillions have you made, baby?
what's available is all mine.
Yeah. Are you with the IRS? What's the purpose of your enquiry?
Yeah. I'll put in my five cents ... As an apologist of Martingale, the father-founder of the netters - I will simply say - "You just don't know how to cook them".
A simple application of martingale should show approximately the following picture
and if you make flips with martin on the grid - the profitability can be up to 10.000% for 1 trading month ... learn the material ... baby...
Apparently you are from that part of the crowd that nagibators of the market). You write an article about your method, I would read it. Only give me tests for 10 years of trading. I will not even demand signals from you. You will earn some money for the article. " learn the material ... baby " . I'm not your child and do not come to me with such phrases.
I'm too lazy to read the article. and so, a few words about the system = simple and uncomplicated.
a grid is formed - MINIMartingale is used - overturned - well and a few nuances such as the beginning of trading from the European session - to the american (there only to close...
apply pyramiding - make reinvestments of the initial lot ... and the profit is in your pocket :)