Avalanche - page 499
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What kind of personal? Have we been drinking on the sly?
No -- publicly.
So...?
User Swetten (Svetlana) has removed this thread from his list. From now on, this thread's posts will only be visible to you.
So there are no questions.
And stop filling your friends' pauses... )
Fractals, as you know, have no parameters. The optimized parameters are Stop Loss and Breakeven parameters. Moreover, beyond the optimization period TS also shows profit.
I believe it shows profit. But it is in the tester.
A man here raised the issue of the difference between demo and real life. It's a pity the pictures have disappeared, but they were quite illustrative.
lasso:
So there are no questions.
And stop filling your friends' pauses... )
Lasso, why the wagging?
Then cite the whole correspondence, not the fact that I deleted this rubbish coming from you.
And the questions remain. Shall I voice them again? Be my guest:
I get the impression that John has dumped another deposit and doesn't have enough money for a new one.
Or maybe not enough, but not for several dozens of flips in a row, like on the demo.
Hence the surge of research activity.
:)
And if we make an analogy with you?
What is it again?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/124482/page497
The very first post.
... and parameters to set Breakeven....
Lasso, why the wagging?
Then cite the whole correspondence, not the fact that I deleted this rubbish coming from you.
Kickpuncher....
Please.
Kickpuncher....
Well, please.
Repeat:
Answered in private.
Let's not bore the public with our strictly personal.... )
I insist on a public answer, for the question was asked publicly.
No need to hide in private.
Will there be an answer to the question asked?
Or should the question be voiced again?
I repeat:
I insist on a public answer, because the question was asked publicly.
No need to hide in private.
I repeat:
there are no questions from you to me on that page!!!
I am beginning to doubt your adequacy.
Can you elaborate a bit more, Yuri, can you comment?
Well, the Breakeven is known to have 2 parameters - the level of profit at which Breakeven is set and the value of Breakeven.
By the way, I absolutely agree with you about the shares - this is one of the few mechanisms that allow to make the TS profitable. Besides, when you use this mechanism correctly, you can avoid increasing risks as compared to the TS that uses only one order in the market.
Vitaly, Svetlana asks which analogy you mean.
I have the impression that John has lost another deposit and does not have enough money for a new one.
Or maybe he has enough money, but not for several dozens of reversals in a row, like on the demo.
Hence the surge of research activity.
:)
And if we make an analogy with you?
What is it again?
ZS Excuse me both, or this will never end.
I repeat:
there is not a single question you asked me on that page!!!
I am beginning to doubt your adequacy.