Discussion of article "Visual strategy builder. Creating trading robots without programming" - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So this feature works for the end (non-programming) user, although not directly, but indirectly - it allows you to attract third-party developers who will add their modules. Without API it is difficult to expand alone.
This is a very sensible idea. Perhaps one day we will reach this point.
Andrew, do you use bitmap resources for icon images or form them vectorially?
Most of them are bmp, and some are drawn (check box).
The idea of creating trading systems without programming (prefabricated constructor method) is not new, but it is always interesting.
Interesting because it helps to make financial markets more attractive - both for beginners and experienced traders,
for those who want to build a robot but don't know how to program.
There is one problem though - at a certain stage of increasing the complexity of such a build, the process becomes commensurate with learning how to program.
with learning how to program.
But such a constructor is useful for popularisation of trading, so thank the author for the article.
The idea is good, it looks interesting, but the ready-made EA is already some kind of twisted - it requires the ability to build with scrolling down or sideways.
ME needs such an interface - write the code in a square and connect, it is convenient, especially if you can make your own icons and save as a blank - think MQ.
However, I am confused, there is no code at the end of the article and in the article itself, which means it is an advertisement of the product. What, now you can write articles about your product and they will be published, or is this a behind-the-scenes arrangement for a select few?
However, I am confused, there is no code at the end of the article, or in the article itself, which means it is an advertisement for the product. Is it now possible to write articles about your product and they will be published, or is it a behind-the-scenes arrangement for a select few?
In this particular case I don't see anything objectionable. Since it is neither a robot nor a signal, but a means of production for non-programmers.
One thing is a commodity, and another thing is a machine for the production of goods and technology. Ordinary goods are subject to duties when imported into the country, while technologies are hunted for and the state itself is ready to pay for them.
There is hardly a behind-the-scenes agreement, as the promotion of this product is in the hands of MQ due to the promotion of the platform.
Moreover, it is true that serious and extensive work for the benefit of MQ should be rewarded.
But a precedent has been set :)))
There are no rules without exceptions, especially for those who make the rules. It would not be wise to go for the principle of "rules" to one's own detriment.
I am sure that anyone who creates something worthwhile and technological for the common good has the right to expect similar loyalty from MQ. And rightly so.
But a precedent has been set :)))
there have been cases like this before, I wanted to deal with the "caterpillar method".
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/190847
alas, the train has left, the article is useless for studying, everything has closed on the Market.
ZY: I read articles about graphical interfaces, alas, and there the train has left - more than half of the examples do not work anymore, it is difficult to say why such a large amount of information and can not be used, there was a kodobaza example of bad codes, now the articles on the site is doubtful how useful they are after half a year - a year.
In this particular case, I see nothing wrong with it. Since it is neither a robot nor a signal, but a means of production for non-programmers.
One thing is a commodity, and another thing is a machine for the production of goods and technology. Ordinary goods are subject to duties when imported into the country, while technologies are hunted for and the state itself is ready to pay for them.
There is hardly a behind-the-scenes agreement, as the promotion of this product is in the hands of MQ due to the promotion of the platform.
Moreover, it is true that serious and extensive work for the benefit of MQ should be rewarded.
But a precedent has been set :)))
There are no rules without exceptions, especially for those who make the rules. It would not be wise to go for the principle of "rules" to your own detriment.
I am sure that anyone who creates something worthwhile and technological for the common good has the right to expect similar loyalty from MQ. And rightly so.
So if it was a free product, albeit closed source, but the 500 c.u. price tag clearly doesn't speak to the common good, or do you mean users are behind the brackets?
I'm not against promotional articles in general, but it needs rules.
And useful would be some kind of digests about community content, with reviews of private blog articles, new products in the marketplace and code base, the output of such a mini magazine would be interesting and convenient, would reach a large audience.
I remember, when I worked in a firm connected with telecommunications, mobile content and computer games, a weekly in-house magazine was published in electronic format, which reviewed the achievements of competitors and in general interesting information on the industry. It really helped to keep abreast of modern and relevant achievements, especially considering that the contracts were full of certain terminology.
Even complex Expert Advisors created by professional programmers mostly generate only losses. I do not believe that a beginner will be able to make something worthwhile by dragging and dropping squares. Besides, there are always exceptional situations in the market, in which an Expert Advisor should behave differently. Trade at a certain time, do not take into account unreasonable quote jumps in the form of "tails", ignore some candlestick combinations, etc. All this requires programming. And without it leads to additional, unjustified losses.
Even if you are right. But this is not what we are talking about. We are talking about a visual and interactive tool for newcomers and those who have not made a mess. Let them learn. I personally, as an mql programmer, am interested in joining the ranks of those interested in the MT platform.