Big changes for MT4, in a few weeks - page 249
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It would be nice yo have well working web version - if they were able to make something OK. But judging from last couple of years, it is not the case
Please techmac..
When We Will Use This Web Version...???
Thanks
Please techmac..
When We Will Use This Web Version...???
ThanksI don't know - it all depends on metaquotes and brokers
How is testing going?
So far it looks OK
I don't know - it all depends on metaquotes and brokers
Hopefully I will be as soon as possible
Thanks Mr. techmac
Build 880 stable so far
Build 880 stable so far
Some good news then
Some good news then
I hope so - that would be a sign of a light at the end of the tunnel
I hope so - that would be a sign of a light at the end of the tunnel
Some are complaining that their EAs are not working as before - I did not notice such things though
How is testing going?
Rotten. Same old same old. ArrayResize of locally declared dynamic arrays fails to initialize. This means that indicators / EAs compiled with Strict will fail. Who knows what wiil happen with compilations without strict, huge memory overwrites.
Reverted back to 840 after first test.
Rotten. Same old same old. ArrayResize of locally declared dynamic arrays fails to initialize. This means that indicators / EAs compiled with Strict will fail. Who knows what wiil happen with compilations without strict, huge memory overwrites. Reverted back to 840 after first test.
Tzuman
What kind of problems you have?
This is an example of an indicators that uses two dimensional dynamic arrays extensively all the time (you could say that it is using nothing but dynamic arrays) written in strict mode, and I have no problem with it in tests (nor with other indicators using arrays) :