You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Dynamic zone smoothed RSI
Immediately one variation on "RSI theme".
The one used in this is the smoothed RSI by Ehlers. Personally I like it better than the "regular" RSI for its faster response in peak pointing (RSI tends to crawl around the 50 line and this one is a bit more responsive to price than the original RSI) For a comparison on this picture are the smoothed RSI - blue and the original RSI - gray
Parameters for smoothed RSI : Parameters for Dynamic zone smoothed RSI : ______________________________PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone ADX
Dynamic zone ADX (metatrader built in ADX)
____________________
Parameters : When ADX is above the zone line, market is trending, when it is bellow the zone line it is in "non trending" mode______________________________
PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone Wilder's ADX
It is a logical step, since we all know that metatrader's build in ADX has very little to do with the original Wilder's ADX (see the picture with compared ADX and Wilder's ADX)
____________________
Parameters : When Wilder's ADX is above the zone line, market is trending, when it is bellow the zone line it is in "non trending" mode______________________________
PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone WPR
Well, it is a dynamic zone of a smoothed WPR (which effectively makes it "almost a stochastic")
______________________________
Parameters : ______________________________PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone ATR
Dynamic zone ATR
Deviation from the original ATR is that this one shows ATR in pips and not in absolute value of the change as the original ATR does. Atr is additionally smoothed, but if you want to avoid the additional smoothing simply set AtrSmooth to anything smaller or equal to 1. According to Leo Zamansky and David Stendahl :
______________________________
Parameters : ______________________________PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone price zone
Dynamic zone price zone (two "flavors" : without and with center line)
______________________________
Parameters : ______________________________PS: the default smoothing is effectively turned off (DzSmooth==1)
PPS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone CCI
Dynamic zone CCI
Since all the trading ways and systems I saw that are using CCI also depend greatly on zero line cross, I wander what would Woodie say on this one
______________________________
Parameters : ______________________________PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
Dynamic zone MACD
Dynamic zone MACD. A deviation from the original MACD is that this one shows MACD in pips. It is partially needed in order to keep the dynamic zone indicator simple (the user side) because otherwise it would need more parameters that are necessary to adjust dynamic zone calculations. This way it is simple, accurate and shows information that is a bit more informative (at least I think so since I am so used to "think in pips") than the original absolute change
______________________________
Parameters : PS : decided to make a version with a dynamic "zero line" too. It is rather interesting (at the least) how the zero line changes and, as far as I am concerned, it is much more useful than the original fixed zero line MACD uses______________________________
PS: dynamicZone.dll for the dll version can be downloaded from the post #1 of this thread
...
Important notice :
Every indicator that did not use a dll for calculating dynamic zone is updated (a dll version is attached along with the "non-dll version") Values are not going to change, but the speed difference and processor usage are significantly better for the dll versions, so I recommend using those instead of the non-dll versions. All the updated have an "dll" in the end of their names.
Mladen again thanks for these indicators, by any chance did you try dynamic zone cfb rsx, just curious?
It is a work in progress
As with some other ting, sometimes Mark Jurik tells something that is rather a "theoretical idea" than a practical one.
The problem is simple : cfb is an oscillator without known upper bound (so without known range) which demands a couple of thing to do before it is used for the purpose Jurik claims it can be used. It should be "normalized" but any normalization is "deforming" the original values. So I first have to find out a harmless way to avoid to much cfb deformation in order to keep it useful for the purpose he metiones (the funny thing is that, as far as I know, Jurik did not make it, but I might be wrong on this statement)
Important notice :
Every indicator that did not use a dll for calculating dynamic zone is updated (a dll version is attached along with the "non-dll version") Values are not going to change, but the speed difference and processor usage are significantly better for the dll versions, so I recommend using those instead of the non-dll versions. All the updated have an "dll" in the end of their names.
It is a work in progress
As with some other ting, sometimes Mark Jurik tells something that is rather a "theoretical idea" than a practical one.
The problem is simple : cfb is an oscillator without known upper bound (so without known range) which demands a couple of thing to do before it is used for the purpose Jurik claims it can be used. It should be "normalized" but any normalization is "deforming" the original values. So I first have to find out a harmless way to avoid to much cfb deformation in order to keep it useful for the purpose he metiones (the funny thing is that, as far as I know, Jurik did not make it, but I might be wrong on this statement)I think you are probably right only version I have seen is the one in his pdf.