Adaptive lookback indicators - page 65
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Dear mladen, any good news for the above indicators ?
Thanks in advance, Andreaandreatrade
Sorry, but it is not suitable for a meaningful (ie : that would result in any kind of improvement) adapting, mainly due to the way how standard deviation is calculated
Added a t3 double smoothing option to the adaptive rsi of adaptive t3.
adaptive_rsi_of_adaptive_t3_2.ex4
Added a t3 double smoothing option to the adaptive rsi of adaptive t3.
adaptive_rsi_of_adaptive_t3_2.ex4
Dearest MRTOOLs,
thank you for ds,now more clean and easy.
regards
ADXm adaptive, but VHF (vertical horizontal filter) adaptive this time : adxm_vhf_adaptive.mq4
____________________
Will use this post for some additional clarification about VHF as adapting method. It is good (no doubt) but only, and only in case when the prices, not some other indicator values, can be used for adapting. The nature of VHF does not work well when instead of using price itself some other value is used for adapting, so the VHF adapting should be limited, in my opinion, only to indicators that can use price as natural source for adapting and calculation
This indicator falls in a category in which price is the source of data, so VHF adapting is suitable for it
ADXm adaptive, but VHF (vertical horizontal filter) adaptive this time : adxm_vhf_adaptive.mq4
____________________
Will use this post for some additional clarification about VHF as adapting method. It is good (no doubt) but only, and only in case when the prices, not some other indicator values, can be used for adapting. The nature of VHF does not work well when instead of using price itself some other value is used for adapting, so the VHF adapting should be limited, in my opinion, only to indicators that can use price as natural source for adapting and calculation
This indicator falls in a category in which price is the source of data, so VHF adapting is suitable for it
Dearest MLADEN,
so many thanks for adding VHF adapting factor in ADXm,what i guess there is only one adaptive ver of ADXm (stdde) before and it would be interesting compare with,and as you told and explained it best fit by its nature with the indicators using prices as main or base source,so VHF is best for those indicators using high low prices........ can it be add to last ADXm Averages 2_6 some day.
regards
Dearest MLADEN,
so many thanks for adding VHF adapting factor in ADXm,what i guess there is only one adaptive ver of ADXm (stdde) before and it would be interesting compare with,and as you told and explained it best fit by its nature with the indicators using prices as main or base source,so VHF is best for those indicators using high low prices........ can it be add to last ADXm Averages 2_6 some day.
regardsmntiwana
This one is a work in progress too (right now trying to find out some substantial change in calculation). As new version will be made they are going to be posted too
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/179723/page2
Dear mR. Tools may i ask what settings u are using to get such a precise crossing of the alb channels
Here is a version in which not just ADXm is adaptive but the floating zero level is adaptive too : adxm_vhf_adaptive_floating_zero.mq4
________________
So, this is a kind of an extreme adaptive indicator. Adapting the zero level makes the level a kind of a an indicator too
Here is a version in which not just ADXm is adaptive but the floating zero level is adaptive too : adxm_vhf_adaptive_floating_zero.mq4
________________
So, this is a kind of an extreme adaptive indicator. Adapting the zero level makes the level a kind of a an indicator too
Dearest MLADEN,
plz excuse me,if i am missing some thing.
,can you review all 2 versions of ADXm,i felt may be name changed opposite or any of feature is missing in code or property in any of them.
regards
Dearest MLADEN,
plz excuse me,if i am missing some thing.
,can you review all 2 versions of ADXm,i felt may be name changed opposite or any of feature is missing in code or property in any of them.
regards
mntiwana
All is OK with the code
In the last version DI value is not displayed (I find that DI usage in that indicator was misleading anyway). Instead what is displayed is the floating zero line as a criteria for "trend" change (when adxm crosses floating zero line the "trend" changes) and that floating zero line calculation period is adaptive too (but it uses the main adxm period for adapting - as a compromise that will disable some "phase missing" for the 2 values)