PipMaker v1 - Price action based EA - page 111

 

It mean i-trend was left untouched, as is now.

First test is with non-reversed i-trend (changed according to montedoro's description).

Third test is v15 with only changed ARSI trigger to ATR to work in same TF and same lenght as ARSI.

[Deleted]  

looks like the third graph has lower risk

Hi Enforcer,

Appreciate the work you put in, I se that the third graph has lower dd and lower profit but well worth it. I am wondering if we could double the risk since the dd is so low and make more profit. What is your opinion?

 

Enforcer, at the first test the value ARSI_trigger=0.007 is too high for M1. It must be =0.003 about. Thats why the trades are very litle.

I`ll try to clear the code in one of my modified versions and you`ll have it in few hours. I`ll prepare some tests as well.

 

Since ARSI_trigger was replaced by ATR, ARSI_trigger is a blind entry, is doing nothing, so it's value have nothing to do with results.

[Deleted]  
Enforcer:
Since ARSI_trigger was replaced by ATR, ARSI_trigger is a blind entry, is doing nothing, so it's value have nothing to do with results.

Can you post fixed mq4?

And maybe test replase ARSI with ADXMA...

Files:
adxma.mq4  7 kb
 

I'll have a look and see what we can put together.

I'm always trying to get lower DD.

So if I can get more profit with DD under 10% will be nice.

Instead of getting high profit from one pair I say is better to have EA running on multiple pairs, each tunned to have a DD under 10% (split risk)

 
Enforcer:
I'll have a look and see what we can put together.

I'm always trying to get lower DD.

So if I can get more profit with DD under 10% will be nice.

Instead of getting high profit from one pair I say is better to have EA running on multiple pairs, each tunned to have a DD under 10% (split risk)

I agree with you. I also prefer to play with EA tuned for low DD.

You didn`t understand me about ARSI_trigger. The ATR_TF must ALWAYS be in M1, doesn`t matter RSI_Period=15, or RSI_Period=60. In the way you made it in V_15_1 it will totaly not working. Also if we increase the ATR_Bars this will increase the average value of ATR and will make the trigger harder - so in this way we can make fine tuning for different pairs. ATR has strange different value in each TF. Example: in M1 from 0.0002 till 0.0012, in M15 from 0.0006 till 0.0038, in M30 from 0.018 till 0.0135 (someting like this). All we need is M1. It fits perfect.

I have another version with much superior separate trailing but may be there is something wrong because is not working as I expect. In this other version impulses grabed by ARSI will not reset MaxRetrace to zero, they will preset the MaxRetrace to let`s say =1 or =0.5 giving last chance our profit to grow if the price continue in the same direction after micro_pause. I`ll send it to you when you want.

 

@Enforcer / Montedoro

Hi,

i get no backtesting and live results with your EA - same parameters. Maybe you know, what I do wrong?

 
erdenmensch:
@Enforcer / Montedoro

Hi,

i get no backtesting and live results with your EA - same parameters. Maybe you know, what I do wrong?

Strange, I download my PipMaker_modified_FOR_TEST_ONLY from my post and now is backtesting normal. Have a look in your "journal" - some errors can exist. Or if your broker doesn`t allow microlots - you must switch MicroAccount=true to false. I have no other idea.