Simbasystem-gbpusd - page 84

 

Maybe yes, but its Simba System, no Dukeofdents system, need respect Simba rules or game another system.

ekaanugeraha:
i agree with you dukeofdents.if we have patient 4h chart is better,thought its hard to be patient
 

Sorry for being off topic like that, Frantatech, I have something I'm working on myself that I'll start a thread on and share with you guys once I think it's actually viable.

Anyway, I'm finding that this Alpari data seems reliable, I've been testing this EA as well. I think, however, and this applies to the system I'm working on, too, that there may be a small problem due to the length of the data set we're using. On Simba's system I see it generating around 130 to 140 trades usually, so 1/the square root of n= around +/- 11.5% sampling error. I'm no mathematician, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with this system, I'm saying that I would be more comfortable testing anything on a larger set of data. That's why I'm trying to find a larger reliable data set, like 10 years of it at least. That will help everyone to test this with a lot greater accuracy, as well as using it for other purposes...

 

Data And Testing

dukeofdents:
Sorry for being off topic like that, Frantatech, I have something I'm working on myself that I'll start a thread on and share with you guys once I think it's actually viable. Anyway, I'm finding that this Alpari data seems reliable, I've been testing this EA as well. I think, however, and this applies to the system I'm working on, too, that there may be a small problem due to the length of the data set we're using. On Simba's system I see it generating around 130 to 140 trades usually, so 1/the square root of n= around +/- 11.5% sampling error. I'm no mathematician, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with this system, I'm saying that I would be more comfortable testing anything on a larger set of data. That's why I'm trying to find a larger reliable data set, like 10 years of it at least. That will help everyone to test this with a lot greater accuracy, as well as using it for other purposes...

Hi Duke and everybody,

1-DATA:You are right,we need more data,not just for testing,but for OUT OF SAMPLE TESTING..when I find it i will post the links or share it.

Duke you are right,4h is safer than 5m,and everybody,please realize that we are trading the 4h tf here,since we trade the 4h satl..the 5m wpr we use to filter,among the 5m noise,advantageous spots to step on board the 4h trend..

2-TESTING: There is a big difference between testing IN SAMPLE and testing OUT OF SAMPLE,I have pasted this link from the EBTA thread in this forum(I suggest you read both the linked pdf and the thread,very interesting..EBTA stands for Evidence Based Technical Analysis which is what everybody interested in making money should use,in conjuction with Fundamentals)...the link

http://www.meyersanalytics.com/publications/optsys.pdf

Regards

Simba

 

Frantacech

Hi Frantacech

Use this if it helps..

Regards

Simba

Files:
 
SIMBA:
Hi Frantacech

Use this if it helps..

Regards

Simba

Great, thank you very much!

 

Hi all,

Finally I'm able to test at least on cable data... see the attachment. The results look alright There's a slight difference caused by the fact that my backtest is performed on data as of July 5, 2004. I don't know the reason, it's another mystery about my MT4 And please excuse the TXT form of the results, being unable to save it as HTM is the third mystery

Now let's wait for Simba to give us next instructions. Meanwhile, I'll try to incorporate the pivots into the EA... I didn't have much time through the weekend but I'm hopeful I can do it tomorrow.

Thanks and bye

Files:
5mbest13.gif  7 kb
5mbest13.txt  27 kb
 

Frantacech-forward test

frantacech:
Thanks, but free only End Of Day. I need ticks or max M1 data.

Hi Frantacech,

What is happening with the forward test ?I can see the official trades but not the B variation ones..????

http://www.rubicon.cz/reports/aos/ea3/statement.htm

http://www.rubicon.cz/reports/aos/ea5/statement.htm

Regards

Simba

 

Peaceleover-data

PeaceLover:
Sir Simba,

I will get back to your questions shortly. But here are a few more links for historical data.

http://www.forexmonaco.com/datas.htm

http://www.forextickdata.com/

http://www.alpari-idc.com/en/dc/databank.php

http://www.forex-historical.com/

I hope this helps.

Peace Out

Hi Peaceleover,and everybody else,

Your first link has 1M DATA,FREE, SINCE 1999 TO 2007...

http://www.forexmonaco.com/datas.htm

DATA is in txt format,and I presume that we will be able to convert it to MT4 data(first thought..txt to csv,then csv to hst)..any idea..???I have downloaded it(GBPUSD for the moment,several pairs are available) and will unzip and start the process this afternoon,so,if anybody know about a faster process please explain..

Frantacech,Malcik,Peacelover,Pilofe,Popok,Duke,anyone interested..When anyone of you confirms that he has been able to download into mt4 the data(and explains how ..;) ) I will post the "suggested next steps" for OUT OF SAMPLE TESTING

Peacelover:Thanks a lot for your links..;)

Regards

Simba

 
SIMBA:
Hi Frantacech,

What is happening with the forward test ?I can see the official trades but not the B variation ones..????

http://www.rubicon.cz/reports/aos/ea3/statement.htm

http://www.rubicon.cz/reports/aos/ea5/statement.htm

Regards

Simba

Nice 100pips, but need close trade in profit. Official without breakeven...we'll see.

I see %R(36) H4, M30 above -5

I will be manual short. But SATL H4 is blue. Is it sin?

GBPUSD sell 1.9720, GBPJPY sell 232.40

It is interesting. Both EAs should have had identical entries (in past they had), at least the code is identical, in my opinion. I would say it's just a happenstance... just as PC is able to manage it. Both run on the same PC.

What I'm interested more is which way the official would manage to close it, because it doesn't have neither breakeven nor trailing and in my opinion both pairs are gona to turn for a harsh short soon.

The Signal of SimbaSystemM1v1.3. on GBPJPY haven't lasted long enough for EA to notice it.

 

Frantacech

frantacech:
Nice 100pips, but need close trade in profit. Official without breakeven...we'll see.

I see %R(36) H4, M30 above -5

I will be manual short. But SATL H4 is blue. Is it sin?

GBPUSD sell 1.9720, GBPJPY sell 232.40

It is interesting. Both EAs should have had identical entries (in past they had), at least the code is identical, in my opinion. I would say it's just a happenstance... just as PC is able to manage it. Both run on the same PC.

What I'm interested more is which way the official would manage to close it, because it doesn't have neither breakeven nor trailing and in my opinion both pairs are gona to turn for a harsh short soon.

The Signal of SimbaSystemM1v1.3. on GBPJPY haven't lasted long enough for EA to notice it.

Hi Frantacech,

When I wrote that we couldn`t see the B trades,I was NOT trying to imply anything against your mod,which i consider very interesting,I was just explaining to you that we couldn`t SEE the list of closed trades..NOW we do,so,I presume you must have solved some problem..

Official will close it either at 355 pips profit or when stopped by 1h Chandelier,which is now at 1.9722(Long entry at 1.9671) for GBPUSD and 231.52 (LONG ENTRY at 231.28)for GBPJPY..Chandelier is a trailing stop,my friend..;)

Regards

Simba

Reason: