Instead of publishing only one selected backtest, this post compares four Gold Beast MT5 risk profiles across the same long historical period.
The purpose is simple: show how changing the level of exposure affects historical growth, drawdown, and overall performance.
Backtest Overview
· EA: Gold Beast MT5
· Platform: MetaTrader 5
· Symbol: XAUUSD
· Recommended timeframe: H1
· Test period: January 2018 to August 2026
· Starting balance for this comparison: $1,000
· Leverage: 1:100
· History quality shown in the reports: 100%
The screenshots below are complete MetaTrader 5 Strategy Tester results rather than only isolated profit figures.
Important: Balance drawdown and equity drawdown are different. Balance drawdown is based on closed-trade balance movement, while equity drawdown also reflects floating positions. For transparent evaluation, both are shown below.
1. Conservative Profile
Quick View
· Starting Balance: $1,000
· Historical Growth: approximately 620%
· Total Net Profit: $6,286.63
· Profit Factor: 3.70
· Recovery Factor: 11.87
· Total Trades: 3,084
· Balance Drawdown Relative: 1.74%
· Equity Drawdown Relative: 9.49%
Quick Takeaway
This is the lowest-exposure profile in this comparison.
It produced the smoothest historical risk characteristics of the four profiles while still participating throughout the full 2018-2026 test period.
For traders who prefer to begin with lower exposure, this is the logical profile to examine first.
2. Balanced Profile
Quick View
· Starting Balance: $1,000
· Historical Growth: approximately 1,950%
· Total Net Profit: $19,503.33
· Profit Factor: 3.84
· Recovery Factor: 7.34
· Total Trades: 2,497
· Balance Drawdown Relative: 2.80%
· Equity Drawdown Relative: 16.31%
Quick Takeaway
Balanced moves the system further toward growth while accepting more floating exposure.
The historical test produced substantially higher net profit than Conservative, while the increase in equity drawdown clearly shows the trade-off that comes with the higher risk setting.
For many users, this is the most useful middle profile to study first.
3. Aggressive Profile
Quick View
· Starting Balance: $1,000
· Historical Growth: approximately 5,180%
· Total Net Profit: $51,823.96
· Profit Factor: 3.87
· Recovery Factor: 5.66
· Total Trades: 2,081
· Balance Drawdown Relative: 4.20%
· Equity Drawdown Relative: 23.89%
Quick Takeaway
Aggressive pushes Gold Beast MT5 further toward growth while accepting greater floating equity exposure.
It generated significantly higher historical growth than the Conservative and Balanced profiles, while the corresponding increase in equity drawdown demonstrates the additional risk involved.
This profile is intended for traders who deliberately choose stronger account growth potential with higher exposure.
For prop-firm accounts in particular, do not select a profile from profit alone. Compare its equity behavior with the exact daily-loss, total-loss, floating-loss, and EA rules of the firm you intend to use.
4. Extremely Aggressive Profile
Quick View
· Starting Balance: $1,000
· Historical Growth: approximately 14,400%
· Total Net Profit: $144,883.52
· Profit Factor: 3.96
· Recovery Factor: 4.44
· Sharpe Ratio: 8.07
· Total Trades: 1,802
· Profit Trades: 76.91%
· Balance Drawdown Relative: 5.56%
· Equity Drawdown Relative: 33.09%
· History Quality: 100% real ticks
Quick Takeaway
Extremely Aggressive represents the highest exposure level in this comparison.
The historical test produced approximately 14,400% growth from a $1,000 starting balance, with a total net profit of $144,883.52 across the tested period.
This higher growth comes with substantially greater floating equity exposure. The Strategy Tester reports 5.56% balance drawdown and 33.09% equity drawdown.
This profile is therefore best viewed as the upper end of Gold Beast MT5 risk and growth settings rather than the default choice for every account.
For prop-firm accounts in particular, the equity drawdown figure is especially important. Always compare the selected risk profile with the firm's daily loss, maximum loss, floating loss, and EA trading requirements.
The Most Important Result Is the Comparison
The purpose of these tests is not to claim that one profile is universally best.
They show a clear historical relationship between exposure, growth, and drawdown.
Conservative - Lower historical exposure and the lowest drawdown in this comparison.
Balanced - Higher historical growth with a moderate increase in exposure.
Aggressive - Substantially higher historical growth with higher floating equity exposure.
Extremely Aggressive - Highest historical growth in this comparison, together with the highest equity drawdown and account exposure.
This allows each trader to choose the risk level that better matches the account rather than running one fixed level of exposure for everyone.
Growth Comparison
Starting from the same $1,000 balance:
· Conservative: approximately 620% growth
· Balanced: approximately 1,950% growth
· Aggressive: approximately 5,180% growth
· Extremely Aggressive: approximately 14,400% growth
The progression demonstrates how Gold Beast MT5 can be configured for significantly different levels of historical risk and growth.
Higher historical returns should never be viewed independently from the corresponding increase in equity exposure.
Why I Use a Long Test Period
Gold has traded through very different environments since 2018.
A long backtest forces the EA to deal with changing volatility, quiet periods, strong trends, reversals, major economic events, and the exceptionally strong Gold movements seen in recent years.
For that reason, I prefer showing the complete January 2018 to August 2026 curve instead of publishing only a short favorable period.
Why Both Balance DD and Equity DD Matter
Balance drawdown measures changes in the closed-trade balance.
Equity drawdown also includes floating profit and loss from open positions.
For basket and grid-based trading systems, equity drawdown provides important additional information about the amount of temporary exposure carried while positions remain open.
That is why both figures are included in these comparisons rather than displaying only the smaller number.
How to Reproduce the Backtest in MT5
If you want to test Gold Beast MT5 yourself, open the MetaTrader 5 Strategy Tester and configure the test using the settings below.
Step 1 - Select the Test Configuration
· Expert: Gold Beast MT5
· Symbol: XAUUSD or your broker's equivalent Gold symbol
· Timeframe: H1
· Date range: January 2018 to August 2026 for comparison with the results shown in this article
· Initial Deposit: $1,000
· Leverage: 1:100
To compare your result with the reports shown above, keep the symbol, H1 timeframe, date range, starting deposit, leverage, and selected Gold Beast MT5 risk profile consistent.
Step 2 - Choose the Modeling Method
MetaTrader 5 provides different modeling modes. The right choice depends on whether you want a faster test or a more detailed real-tick test.
For Faster Testing: 1 Minute OHLC
Select 1 minute OHLC when you want to test the EA much faster. This mode is useful for quicker comparisons, checking settings, comparing risk profiles, and performing repeated tests without waiting for a full real-tick simulation.
For Detailed Real-Tick Testing: Every tick based on real ticks
Select Every tick based on real ticks when you want the most detailed test using the real tick history available from your broker or testing data source.
Real-tick testing requires significantly more data and normally takes much longer to complete, but it should be used for final verification when you want the closest historical simulation available in the MT5 Strategy Tester.
Simple rule: Use 1 minute OHLC for faster testing and optimization-style comparisons. Use Every tick based on real ticks for the final detailed backtest.
Recommended Testing Workflow
A practical way to test Gold Beast MT5 is:
· 1. Start with 1 minute OHLC for a fast initial test.
· 2. Select the Gold Beast MT5 risk profile you want to evaluate.
· 3. Compare the balance curve, equity behavior, profit, and drawdown.
· 4. Once you are satisfied with the selected settings, change the modeling mode to Every tick based on real ticks.
· 5. Run the final detailed test using the same symbol, H1 timeframe, date range, deposit, leverage, and EA settings.
This approach can save considerable testing time while still allowing you to perform a detailed real-tick verification before making your final assessment.
Note: A 1 minute OHLC test and an Every tick based on real ticks test may not produce perfectly identical results. The modeling methods process historical price movement differently. For the most detailed final result, use Every tick based on real ticks.
Reproduce the Test on Your Own Broker
Backtests can change between brokers because XAUUSD trading conditions are not identical.
Spread, commission, swap, contract specifications, price history, execution conditions, and tick data can all affect the final result.
Before using any EA live, I recommend running the Gold Beast MT5 demo in MetaTrader 5 with conditions representative of the broker and account you intend to use.
That gives you something more useful than simply trusting my screenshots: your own result.
About Gold Beast MT5
Gold Beast MT5 is a fully automated Expert Advisor developed specifically for Gold / XAUUSD on MetaTrader 5.
It includes automated trade and basket management, selectable risk profiles, money-management options, adaptive profit management, high-impact news protection, and spread/slippage controls.
Recommended timeframe: H1.
Gold Beast MT5
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/191793
If you test Gold Beast MT5 with a different broker, feel free to share your broker, account conditions, selected risk profile, modeling method, and Strategy Tester result in the comments. Comparing results across different environments can be useful for everyone.
Final Note
These are historical Strategy Tester results provided for evaluation and comparison. The best way to evaluate Gold Beast MT5 is to reproduce the test using your own broker data and select a risk profile appropriate for your account and trading objectives.
