Since most EAs have history reader, who should i contact at MQL5 to complain about the state of this marketplace ? - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Show the image from the backtest where the history quality is indicated as 100%.
I don't have to show anything else. Real ticks start on 1st Jan 2025 onwards. My analysis does not need to go far to prove this EA is cheating.
I don't have to show anything else. Real ticks start on 1st Jan 2025 onwards. My analysis does not need to go far to prove this EA is cheating.
Of course, you are not obligated to show anything to anyone. However, I am simply trying to help you, to ensure you are well-informed for your own benefit, and to prevent you from persisting in error.
I have shown you the stats of the backtest from 2025 in a pic just now. There is no point showing anything else.
The backtest in MT5 format is not a statistical analysis, it's just data and it does not separate the two parts.
But if you want msg me and I will send you the full analysis no worries :)
I have shown you the stats of the backtest from 2025 in a pic just now. There is no point showing anything else.
The backtest in MT5 format is not a statistical analysis, it's just data and it does not separate the two parts.
But if you want msg me and I will send you the full analysis no worries :)
That data is irrelevant, as it lacks 100% historical data quality. You can make as much noise on the forum as you like—either you understand the issue and avoid it, or... well, that’s your choice. I tried to help you, with good intentions; as for the rest... best of luck.
The data is relevant since 2025 it is guaranteed to be 100% quality.
You do run standard backtests don't you? And you know as much as i do that data is of full quality on MT5 from 2025.
This file shows the performance history of a yet unnamed EA on the MQL5 marketplace, from a standard MetaTrader 5 backtest
The alternative way to share a backtest without violating forum rules—while also allowing the backtest data to be opened directly within the Tester itself.
I also investigated that case (an other EA), and while there are some interesting information, there is also no proof of causality about cheating. What is proven is a correlation not causality. There are legitimate usage of hardcoded data (dates) in EA for the Market, finding dates in an ex5 prove nothing. Using a custom symbol with shifted dates, and having different results compared to the original, is also not a causality proof of cheating.
Again, I am not saying there is no cheating this or that EA, I am just saying the evidences are weak or insufficient.
I completely agree. It is impossible to prove intent or an intention to deceive. There is only circumstantial evidence.
Oh I see. Seriously ? So here is your logic :
1. All EAs are compiled. It is illegal to decompile. No one apart from the creator can see code. MQL5 market organisers do not see the code either so they can't prove anything.
2. When Statistical evidence comes of an issue, follow the following "Deny, deflect" protocol below
a) Respond that the evidence is not enough (never enough)
b) Respond that it is impossible to prove intent to deceive regardless of the evidence
c) Classify it as circumstancial evidence
d) Conclude that there are no issues
=> Argument won.
That logic is really advanced. Well done. Wow. I am truly impressed.