Apophenia as an apologist for clairvoyance in the capital markets. - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's like looking at whether the price moves the shapes or the shapes move the price.
It's all relative.
As for the passengers flying on the plane, we can say that they are at rest and their speed is zero. This is on the one hand if you consider their speed relative to the plane. On the other hand, we can say that those sitting still in the plane are moving relative to the ground at the speed of the flying plane. Both statements are true. Those who say that the speed of passengers is zero and those who say that the speed of passengers is equal to the speed of the plane are right.
Regarding a flying plane, one can say that for those watching from the ground, it is in motion relative to the ground, and for those in the plane, on the contrary, that the ground is moving and the plane is stationary.
Regarding the Earth, on the one hand it can be said that it is not in motion, and on the other hand that it not only rotates on its axis, but that it also orbits around the Sun. The statement that an object which is stationary on the earth's surface has zero speed would also be correct, as would the statement that an object orbiting the earth's axis moves in an earthly orbit around the sun.
Regarding the Sun one can say that on the one hand it is stationary at the centre of the solar system, and on the other hand it and with it the whole solar system moves relative to something else out there.
So, one decides for oneself whether the fractals are formed as the result of price changes or the price changes as the result of formation of fractals. Both have their place.
any market condition has multiple outcomes. At least two. You will never know exactly which one it will be or when.
I absolutely agree with you and am of the opinion that no one will ever know exactly and for certain with 100% probability the market movement.
You don't need to know for sure, just a slight tilt in your favour.
One person only needs 51%, the other 99% is not enough.
It's like looking at whether the price moves the shapes or the shapes move the price.
It's all relative.
As for the passengers flying on the plane, we can say that they are at rest and their speed is zero. This is on the one hand if you consider their speed relative to the plane. On the other hand, we can say that those sitting still in the plane are moving relative to the ground at the speed of the flying plane. Both statements are true. Those who say that the speed of passengers is zero and those who say that the speed of passengers is equal to the speed of the plane are right.
Regarding a flying aeroplane, one can say that for those watching from the ground, it is in motion relative to the ground, and for those in the aeroplane, on the contrary, that the ground is moving and the aeroplane is stationary.
Regarding the Earth, on the one hand it can be said that it is not in motion, and on the other hand that it not only rotates on its axis, but that it also orbits around the Sun. The statement that an object which is stationary on the earth's surface has zero speed would also be correct, as would the statement that an object orbiting the earth's axis moves in an earthly orbit around the sun.
Regarding the Sun one can say that on the one hand it is stationary at the centre of the solar system, and on the other hand it and with it the whole solar system moves relative to something else out there.
So, one decides for oneself whether the fractals are formed as the result of price changes or the price changes as the result of formation of fractals. Both have their place.
Only the monkey in Krylov's fable can discuss an article without reading it.
And no one is seriously discussing the religious ramblings of a madman 😁
The monkey with glasses is a perfect metaphor for how illiterate bigoted people with inflated ego cling to terms from technical sciences (fractal, attractor) without understanding the meaning - exactly like that same monkey from the fable, clinging glasses on her tail - that's exactly how these attempts at charts look...
And no one is seriously discussing the religious ramblings of a madman 😁
The monkey with the glasses is a perfect metaphor for how illiterate bigoted people with inflated ego cling to technical science terms (fractal, attractor) without understanding the meaning - exactly like the same monkey in the fable clinging glasses to her tail - that's exactly how those attempts at charts look...
Thank you very much.
Please, please, don't go anywhere, continue and we will remember all the fables of Ivan Andreevich Krylov.
A hare once came to the woods
And told wonders,
He could walk on water,
Defeat any beast
And swallow anything.
Andto prove it, hewalked through the puddlein public
He swatted a mosquito with his paw,
And then ate a pretty clever
cabbage and a carrot.
♪ To the cheers of"Wonderful!" ♪"Encore!
"
And imme diately sponsors were found And money was poured into the bowl.
Dreaming of riches close at hand,
Bunny went out to bow.
And the audience on all sides
yells, "Hey, Eeyore the Magician!
Now wiggle around the lake!
Fight the bear!
And don't choke on a brick!"
The braggart was not confused:
"This is all too boring, really!
I'm ready to eata carrot,
I'm ready to eat it again,
Walk through a puddle once more
And fight a mosquito in a fight!"
All that people offered,
The little bunny turned away
And repeated the same thing,
It's the only thing he can do.
Alas,
there's alot of idea-pushersamong the people,
,Who pay lip service to the mansion,
But they're worthless in reality.
Krylov I.A., 1808.
The Elephant and the Mosca.
The Elephant was led through the streets,
As it seems to be for show
Elephants are known to be a rarity in our country.
And so the Elephant was followed by crowds of onlookers.
When they saw the Elephant, they saw the Moose.
When he saw the Elephant, he ran at him,
Barking and squealing and tearing,
and he gets into a fight with him.
"Neighbor, stop shaming him."
The mutt says to her, "Why are you bothering with an elephant?
"Look, you're wheezing, but he's walking
Goes on
and he doesn't notice your barking."
"Eh, eh!" says the mousy:
"That's what gives me spirit,
That I, without a fight at all,
I can get into big fights.
Let the dogs say:
"Oh, the mosey! He knows he's strong,
For barking at the elephant!"
Hic Rhodus, hic salta.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta is an aphorism going back to Aesop. The saying suggests the interlocutor, who brags about his successes, which no one has seen, prove his talent here, on the spot ("instead of bragging, show it in action": do not talk about your glorious deeds done somewhere or once, but show your capabilities here and now). Often quoted in Latin, though the extant original was written in Greek: Greek ιδού η Ρόδος, ιδού και το πήδημα.
Andrey Niroba #:
The models of future dynamics I present here have a higher probability of realization than the other models.
Shall we prove it or just rant?
The moths yapping in my private office should post here so that everyone's dope is visible.