The future of the Forex industry - page 79

 
khorosh:

I have strong doubts that a technocrat and cynic like yourself still has such a primal sense as shame. With such a sense it is not possible to steal from employees by unfairly appropriating part of their earnings).

It's such a figure of speech, nothing more.

If I say "My God" - you won't say that I'm a believer, will you?

 
transcendreamer:

Voting rights should be earned, they say, not obtained for free.

In my opinion, this is a very good idea. Any sensible choice requires sufficient competence, which needs to be built up and proven. It is the norm of life that in a family, decisions are made by adults - parents, not young children, well because they are smarter and more experienced. No one is surprised that in order to get a serious position, you must be educated and then work long and hard in your profession. There is a hierarchy in any field of activity which determines the importance of a particular person's opinion and it is built precisely on the basis of experience and knowledge: table of ranks, grades, academic and military ranks, etc. So why, when it comes to elections, is the criterion of competence, which determines a person's ability to make an informed choice, simply ignored? Is this some simple matter? It is a complex question, and the quality of the answer follows directly from the personality and qualities of the person answering it. But for some reason everyone is allowed to answer indiscriminately, and the votes are then counted at face value, equating the vote of a reasonable person to that of a fool.

 
Ahhhh ) the denial stage is over, the anger stage has begun. Something tells me that this is where the couple will stop, because of their perceptions)
 
Олег avtomat:

Apparently your mind is completely screwed up...

After your "revelations", Ifeel nothing but squeamishness and contempt (to put it mildly).

You have supporters here, they must envy you. That's your liberal way.

And you don't have to show your resentment to everyone here like that.

Realise that your anger towards the capitalist Drimmer is psychological transference, powerless envy, a sense of hostility to blame Drimmer for your own failings in life.

This is what poor and underachieving citizens always do when they say that capitalism is getting in the way of their life.

This is reinforced by a grievous admission of the futility of trying to raise your status in life or in society.

In fact you are hindered by your own inefficiency, unwillingness or inability to develop.

This is all important in the context of the psychology of forming a socialist view.

The cause of your failures is not some external enemy, but yourself.

The road to ascent begins with an awareness of this fact.

 
Andrei Trukhanovich:
Ahhhh ) the denial stage is over, the anger stage has begun. Something tells me that's where the couple will stop, due to their perceptions )

it's all very important for trading! 😆

 
transcendreamer:

Seriously, Yusuf, has anyone ever used this nonsense with this "market theory"?

Trying to create an alternative mana world, sounds like to me.

No offence intended.

Try reading a basic macroeconomics course instead of reinventing the wheel. 😁

And you find another interpretation of the profit formula in the economic literature instead of denying the obvious without any verbal evidence. How can they use it when they pretend not to notice. This is either from a lack of understanding or a lack of desire to understand anything. It turns out that, on this point, the bicycle has not yet been invented. Any counterfacts?

For your information: I am not yet a professor, but only a PhD acting associate professor.

 
transcendreamer:

Here's another clear indication that you're jealous of me! 🤣

When a person starts attacking you, it's definitely a sign of anger and envy.

But it's also legitimate - you recognise yourself in the descriptions of the less successful/ineffective - that's why you bomb.

Otherwise, you wouldn't bomb...

It's obvious to everyone...

Stupidity taken to the point of absurdity.

 
transcendreamer:

it's all very important for trading! 😆

I think the most important trait without which you cannot survive in trading is the ability to admit your mistakes, the sooner the better

 
vladavd:

In my opinion, this is a very good idea. Any sensible choice requires sufficient competence, which needs to be built up and confirmed. It is the norm of life that in a family, decisions are made by adults - parents, not young children, well because they are smarter and more experienced. No one is surprised that in order to get a serious position, you must be educated and then work long and hard in your profession. There is a hierarchy in any field of activity which determines the importance of a particular person's opinion and it is built precisely on the basis of experience and knowledge: table of ranks, grades, academic and military ranks, etc. So why, when it comes to elections, is the criterion of competence, which determines a person's ability to make an informed choice, simply ignored? Is this some simple matter? It is a complex question, and the quality of the answer follows directly from the personality and qualities of the person answering it. But for some reason everyone is allowed to answer indiscriminately, and votes are then counted at face value, equating the voice of a reasonable person to that of a fool.

Yes, it is important to recognise the value of people, I am personally in favour of meritocracy in one form or another.

At the same time, the losers and people who have sunk to the bottom should not be disenfranchised altogether.

They should still have basic rights so that they have a chance to rise.

Otherwise there will be bitterness and class hatred (just like Mr. Automat here now).

But if a person doesn't want to rise up on their own, there's no need to drag them up either.

Equal voice creates a skew towards the crowd / ochlos.

Ideally, the weight of the vote should reflect some kind of social significance of the person.

 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov:

And you find another interpretation of the profit formula in the economic literature instead of denying the obvious.

Go to the library and start reading from Adam Smith right away!

Sounds like you've been cooped up all these years if you've never once seen the profit formula.

😆

Reason: