
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And more than once).
Catching animals is poaching (snares, traps...) You can only kill them.
Catching animals is poaching (snares, traps...) You can only kill them.
It's not about that at all, I was just making an analogy
A sensible definition of automatic trading conditions for Haraal in my opinion:
Take any type of buy or sell order,
the graphical system should always take a profit by opening the same type of orders throughout the testing period,
either buy or sell, on any historical period and for any duration.
The time difference between order re-opening should be no more than a week.
I.e. at least one new order must be opened every week.
And to estimate objectively, let's take the history from 2010 to 2020 of our widely loved EURUSD.
Ratio of maximal loss to the total profit should not be less than 1:10 for the last 10 years of history with maximal drawdown not more than 30% of the initial deposit (initial deposit should not exceed 5000$ to keep it close to the reality).
Who has any thoughts on this?
A sensible definition of automatic trading conditions for Haraal in my opinion:
Take any type of buy or sell order,
the graphical system should always take a profit by opening the same type of orders throughout the testing period,
either buy or sell, on any historical period and for any duration.
The time difference between order re-opening should be no more than a week.
I.e. at least one new order must be opened every week.
And to estimate objectively, let's take the history from 2010 to 2020 of our widely loved EURUSD.
Ratio of maximal loss to the total profit should not be less than 1:10 for the last 10 years of history with maximal drawdown not more than 30% of the initial deposit (initial deposit should not exceed 5000$ to keep it close to the reality).
Who has any thoughts on this?
i tried a simple experiment
i downloaded the whole history of the eve
At the beginning of the story, you open a minlot and do nothing else.
Run the test.
drain
;)
another example
the program stops due to lack of funds
a little later the tester draws a flush
;)
So, the grail should work without stopping and bring profit in any weather and nothing else.
I once set up a simple experiment
I downloaded the entire history of the eve.
At the beginning of the story, you open the minlot and do nothing else.
let's do the test!
drain
;)
another example
the program stops due to lack of funds
a little later the tester draws a flush
;)
So, the grail should work without stopping and bring profit in any weather and nothing else.
i was experimenting in the wrong place...
i should have done it with BTC :-)
I was experimenting in the wrong place...
should have been with BTC :-)
ran the program (no experience) and there
no difference in principle
everywhere is fine
I would rather the price would fluctuate, no matter how
Sash, the grail is a system for switching from buy to sell and not to dump.
Something's wrong with your switch...
The switch is already perfect in the chart itself - you don't need anything else. If you put triple-decker integrals with arithmetic, it will be worse.
The switch is perfect already in the graph itself - you don't need anything else.You just need to see and strictly follow the "instructions" If you top it with triple-decker integrals with God forbid arithmetic, it will be worse.
Can you be more specific?
Well just look at the chart without a backward glance and see his instructions, it's all clear.
Well just without a backward glance at the graph and you see his instructions, it all makes sense.
There you go!