Programmer's question. - page 4

 
Реter Konow:

It is my belief that the idea developer (one person) and his venture capitalist (the other person) should share equally in the income from their joint venture, if, of course, it will bring it... If not, the capitalist will lose money and the author of the idea will lose credibility among the other investors and will be unlikely to repeat his mistakes at their expense. So, - the risk and the investment in the business are quite comparable.

))))

Peter! Well, this business model does not work!

From your words, any IE who hired 2-3 workers should share the profits equally. Do the hired workers know where their start-up capital came from? Yes, maybe it's credit money and business losses are a straight road to bankruptcy? They just do not give a damn!


SZS: In the army a battalion commander said the right thing - as soon as a man gets at least one subordinate, this man becomes a leader and his outlook on life changes completely - this is how it works, with the arrival of a subordinate there are problems completely unrelated to the business, he got drunk, then got in an accident.... and the business has to work and not be loss-making!

Although... perhaps we are not talking about business, but about a startup .... Well, no one cares, there is the author of the idea, a bunch of deer who wait for profit from funds contributed, the author of the idea could not organize the development project, investors flew by for not significant amounts, all alive and well, let's move on.

But there is a partnership business model, where a clear agreement is made who is responsible for what and who gets what in the event of closing the business, but when strengthening such a company in the market, this model will be changed to co-ownership - this will reduce the risks of business alienation - well, pressed the partner life situations, he took and closed his participation in the project - all business to close? - and the urgent closure of the business is an additional cost

 

In reality, this is not the case. The author of an idea, with modest means, realises his idea in a modest way. What else is there to do? You don't put ideas in a drawer.

The idea becomes available to everyone. The capitalist, if he finds it interesting, then pursues it in a more modest way. It is simple competition.

Even if something can be registered as an invention, it makes no sense. Whoever needs it will rewrite it in other words.

 
Igor, you do not seem to be reading the post you are replying to))).
 

Read how it has happened, is happening and will continue to happen, and nothing will ever change

10 малоизвестных изобретателей, у которых «украли» известные изобретения
10 малоизвестных изобретателей, у которых «украли» известные изобретения
  • hi-news.ru
Говорят, историю пишут победители. Но в некоторых случаях ее пишут и счастливчики — особенно, когда человеческая цивилизация начинает перебирать заслуги людей. Зачастую важные прорывы, осуществленные малоизвестными людьми, готовят почву для других людей, которые присваивают открытия себе. В других случаях, эти прорывы просто остаются...
 
Реter Konow:
Igor, I have the impression that you do not read the post you are replying to)). I wrote - the author of the idea is a developer-programmer, not a mercenary-employer-capitalist

I read, but I have no idea what a developer-programmer can offer as a final product

the consumer is interested in the final product, but as I wrote above - one developer-programmer cannot cope with his own forces - life is not enough to create a final product

Maybe we see the end product differently, I see it as ... for example a car head unit that contains elements of novelty - point your finger to the window, the car starts moving in that direction..... yawn, the car is parked ))))


but simple crafts and creativity, imho this is a hobby, not an idea that will become a business - for a programmer alone, as I have written more than once, the amount of work and knowledge for one person is unaffordable, that is to the first post of the topic - there is nothing to appropriate capitalist, just a blank code does not interest anyone

 
Igor Makanu:

I read, but I have no idea what a developer-programmer can offer as a final product

the consumer is interested in the final product, but as I wrote above - one developer-programmer can not cope by himself - life is not enough to create a final product

Maybe we see the end product differently, I see it as ... for example a car head unit that contains elements of novelty - point your finger to the window, the car starts moving in that direction..... yawn, the car is parked ))))


and just crafts and creativity, imho this is a hobby, not an idea that will become a business - for a programmer alone, as I have written more than once, the amount of work and knowledge for one person is unaffordable, that is the first post of the topic - there is nothing to appropriate capitalist, just a blank code does not interest anyone long ago

We cannot know for sure.

Документация по MQL5: Математические функции / MathExp
Документация по MQL5: Математические функции / MathExp
  • www.mql5.com
MathExp - Математические функции - Справочник MQL5 - Справочник по языку алгоритмического/автоматического трейдинга для MetaTrader 5
 
The right solution to the author-developer's problem in understanding the problem.
 

"Disney actress made a million dollars a day on a porn site."


I take it back, there is still a big field for new ideas!

)))

 

Shit...so if the capital is not venture capital, then everything is ok ? peace and friendship, everyone is happy and rights are protected

"Peter has once again opened the dictionary and is drawing from it new/mysterious words to throw around in sentences."

---

The source code is protected quite simply - the copyright, license and EULA are specified and the code is either published or kept extremely private (or all publicly or only for extremely trusted people, against a signature).

The work is additionally protected with version control and authenticated signatures + timestamps.

ALL

If there is the slightest suspicion that the "whales" have used the software without any contract, any law firm will tear them apart. Protection of rights and licenses is a huge business, just give them a reason to go after someone.

In Russia, algorithm=formula and not a subject of copyright. If you sell code/software to the West, set up a legal entity in the UK and work from there.

 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

Shit...so if the capital is not venture capital, then everything is ok ? peace and friendship, everyone is happy and rights are protected

"Peter has opened the dictionary again and is drawing from it new/mysterious words to throw around in sentences."

---

The source code is protected quite simply - the copyright, license and EULA are specified and the code is either published or kept extremely private (or all publicly or only for extremely trusted people, against a signature).

The work is additionally protected with version control and authenticated signatures + timestamps.

ALL

If there is the slightest suspicion that the "whales" have used the software without any contract, any law firm will tear them apart. Protection of rights and licenses is a huge business, just give them a reason to go after someone.

In Russia, algorithm=formula and not a subject of copyright. If you sell code/software to the West, set up a legal entity in the UK and work from there.

If the protection is extremely simple, it is in fact non-existent.)
Reason: