Uladzimir Izerski page - page 37

 
Vyacheslav Nekipelov:

Of course, it's a walk from China to the first results (some may get there), but it's definitely not going to the North Pole)))

And if you say figuratively in the coordinates of the graph of profitability, it turns out with greater probability, that not in the direction of Antarctica).
By starting to use the CME data you just get into a crowd of professional market participants, who are just as tricked and just as other participants are trying to cheat. That's why many people try this information, but it does not give reliable results and stop using it. But its use takes you from casino business to market business. Without CME, you are playing in a casino. With a CME, you trade by the rules of the stock market.
 
Mihail Marchukajtes:
When you start using CME data, you only join the crowd of professional market participants who are just as likely to be conned by other participants and who are just as likely to be conned by others. That is why many people try this information and do not get reliable results, so they stop using it. But its use takes you from casino business to market business. Without CME, you are playing in a casino. With a CME, you trade by the rules of the stock market.

That's all for sure.

 
Mihail Marchukajtes:
By starting to use CME data you just join the crowd of professional market participants, who are also being tricked and who are also trying to cheat other participants. That's why many people try this information and do not get reliable results, so they give up using it. But its use takes you from casino business to market business. Without CME, you are playing in a casino. With a CME, you trade by the rules of the stock market.

Laughter in the auditorium, turning into mass hysteria... :-)

it doesn't matter where or what data you take it from - magic bubbles in their interpretation.

there are as many losers on the CME as there are outside it.

 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

Laughter in the auditorium, turning into mass hysteria... :-)

it doesn't matter where or what data you take it from - magic bubbles in their interpretation.

there are as many losers on the CME as there are outside it.

That's what I mean. There are a lot of losers on SMEs, but without SMEs there are many more...
 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

Laughter in the auditorium, turning into mass hysteria... :-)

it doesn't matter where or what data you take it from - magic bubbles in their interpretation.

there are not many less losers in the CME than outside it.

So it further depends on the application of that data, on trading strategies...

95 had a good laugh, 5 - just take it in stride...) It's like this)

I'll tell by my own experience: I've read a lot on this forum, tested, considered, built up, tested again. But the most important thing - the results of trading went up).

And I'm sure it really works and there's logic in it ) So... It's better than MAs, bollinger, flextime - which are purely subjective and can be adjusted from the background...)

But of course, this is purely my opinion too...
 
Sergey Lazarenko:

I don't understand what the weather has to do with it. The idea is that if the price goes even higher (new peak) and the volumes go down, it is a harbinger of a reversal, and they project it onto the forex, like a divergence between the volumes and the price. But how the divergence between the price and volumes in the CM may affect the global forex, I do not understand? Where is the connection? What does limited volumes on CME and forex have to do with it?

CME volumes are the same in form (not scale) as forex volumes. The partial is like the whole, and the scale is not important when you are not operating with absolute values.

 
vladavd:

CME volumes are similar in form (not scale) to forex volumes. The partial is similar to the whole, and the scale is not important when the values are not absolute.

Yes, all these key points, necessary for understanding, have been repeatedly mentioned in the topic )))) It's already been understood five times ))))

When I analyzed the information from various branches of the forum and compared it to practical applications, everything was much more difficult and time-consuming... )

But nevertheless, as it seems and as practice shows, I can now already use it...

 
Vyacheslav Nekipelov:

There have already been all these key points in the thread many times, which are necessary to understand )))) You could have understood it all five times already ))))

When I analyzed the information from various branches of the forum and compared it to practical application, everything was much more difficult and time-consuming... )

Nevertheless, it seems and practice shows that I can use it now...

I am struggling to understand it, can you explain the key points again, in order to understand them.

I only understood about the shrimp, the Belarusian shrimp... :)

 
apr73:

I'm a bit slow on the uptake, can you explain again the key points you need to understand.

I only understood about the shrimp, Belarusian ... :)

The most important point is to buy the indicators that the topstarter advertises.

The rest is all nonsense and about shrimp, too )). Caspian shrimp better)).

I wonder what would happen if everyone begins a theme here in the name of himself, and advertise their handicrafts?

 
Sergey Chalyshev:

The most important thing is to buy the indicators that the top-starter advertises.

The rest is all nonsense and about the shrimp, too )).

I wonder what would happen if everyone starts a theme in the name of himself, and advertise their handicrafts?

This is really the main point. But while ts warming eggs and do not hurry to answer questions.

I would like to know more about the volume.

Reason: