Uladzimir Izerski page - page 36
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Oh don't, there's so much nonsense in those tests.
The truth is that the license to manage any kind of capital and funds (including pension funds) is only 3.5 thousand rubles.at least at the noughts institute or try to prepare for the FSFM certificate. The answers to the questions there are very interesting.
It's enough from you that you don't understand what an OTC market is....
No, this kind of advice would not suit me. All these institutions are aimed at formal studies, the goal is to get a crust. I want to understand the market and take the money out of it. I'll tell you right away, certified specialists with diplomas - a dime a dozen, I prefer to study independently what interests me, I do not need a fucking diploma, I'm not going to join the hordes of such specialists.
It's not about the tests, it's about the information they ask for. But you have to have common sense, which no school can buy.
FSFM licence (issues have not changed since the 199s)...
Well, it's the fact that the knowledge of 3 courses in economics, as a basis is good, but for the current realities is not much useNo, that advice would not suit me, all these institutions are aimed at formal studies, the aim is to get a crust, and why do I need a crust? I want to understand the market and extract money from it. I'll tell you right away, certified specialists with diplomas - a dime a dozen, I prefer to study independently what interests me, I do not need a fucking diploma, I'm not going to join the hordes of such specialists.
The main thing is to perceive everything adequately, do not fly in the captivity of your conclusions, which are not infrequently erroneous and remember. "Only a fool and a dead man does not change his mind" (c) Winston Churchill.
The interesting thing is that I try to think adequately, to be logical, but you see how it turns out, they do not perceive my vision, there was a dude at the beginning of the thread, he was crazy about delta with CME, all the others were suckers, jerks and the like, and he was not confused by the argument that CME is just one of many exchanges, and he did not empty his mouth), but convinced all the fools that volumes from CME affect the pricing of forex. I would like to believe it, but 1 +1 equals 2, not 1. Many banks and orginizations trade and everyone is looking at the CME, what price is there? And what are the traders trading there?
It's not logical, but to take volumes from the stock exchange, which in no way affects the price, why should it? There is no connection, or what is there?The interesting thing is that I try to think adequately, to be logical, but you see how it turns out, they do not perceive my vision, there was a dude at the beginning of the thread, he was crazy about delta with CME, all the others were suckers, jerks and the like, and he was not confused by the argument that CME is just one of many exchanges, and he did not empty his mouth), but convinced all the fools that volumes from CME affect the pricing of forex. I would like to believe it, but 1 +1 equals 2, not 1. Many banks and orginizations trade and everyone is looking at the CME, what price is there? And what do traders trade there?
This is not logical, but to take volumes from the exchange, which in no way affects the price, what for? There is no connection, or is there?The same banks trade on the stock exchange and on the spot. Since the CME is a liquid market, and the futures is cointegrated with the underlying asset, its data is relevant for forex. It is like watching the weather in Moscow in Butovo: the difference is vanishingly small.
The same banks trade on the exchange and on the spot. Since the CME is a liquid market and the futures is cointegrated with the underlying asset, its data is relevant to forex. It's like watching the weather in Moscow in Butovo: the difference is vanishingly small.
I don't understand what the weather has to do with it. The idea is that if the price goes up (new peak) and volumes go down, it heralds the reversal and everybody projects it into forex, like a divergence between volumes and price. But how the divergence between the price and volumes in the CM may affect the global forex, I do not understand? Where is the connection? What does limited volumes on CME and forex have to do with it?
I don't understand what the weather has to do with it. The idea is that if the price goes even higher (new peak) and the volumes go down, it is a harbinger of a reversal, and they project it onto the forex, like a divergence between the volumes and the price. But how the divergence between the price and volumes in the CM may affect the global forex, I do not understand? Where is the connection? What does limited volumes on CME and forex have to do with it?
You just have to look at it from a "different angle" and voila - clarification.
But not everyone understands this really simple truth. The example with the weather already followed in the reexplanation (!))) Perhaps that's why not so many succeed.
Several times already exactly written here by people about the principle, but ...can't all be on the plus side...
The same banks trade on the exchange and on the spot. Since the CME is a liquid market and the futures is cointegrated with the underlying asset, its data is relevant to forex. It is like watching the weather in Moscow in Butovo: the difference is vanishingly small.
This example about the weather quite accurately describes the situation, if we consider that in Butovo installed additional devices allowing to receive additional information. One which is not in the rest of Moscow (as an example) at CME are such data which is not on FOREX. Thus the trade is much better quality. But you, Sergey Lazarenko, had better not use it, and use stochastic and bollinger. Basically, we need such traders ...
Of course, it's a walk from China to the first results (some may get there), but it's definitely not going to the North Pole)))
And if you say figuratively in coordinates of profitability chart, it turns out with higher probability, that not in the direction of Antarctica...)