You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Try this option
No, there are no other subtleties.
No, there are no other subtleties.
What subtleties?
No, there are no other subtleties.
One more question remains: If the year 2000 was or up to and including 2009, what was the futures name? Like RTS-3.00, RTS-3.05 or RTS-3.5
One more question remains: If the year 2000 was or up to and including 2009, what was the futures name? Like RTS-3.00, RTS-3.05 or RTS-3.5
3.05 (00 - 99)
Try this option
No Sergei. Sorry, but this is not acceptable at all.
3.05 (00 - 99)
Thank you, so I will consider the function as working for me and will use it.
By the way, if the second parameter is a negative number, the previous futures should be obtained.
Thank you, so I will consider the function to be working for me and will use it.
By the way, if I put a negative number as the second parameter, the previous futures should be obtained.
Ok
What subtleties?
My mistake, I thought I was replying to Alexei... :)
Time to stop drinking beerMy mistake, I thought I was replying to Alexei... :)
Time to stop drinking beer.Since we're discussing the quantity and quality of drinks, let me ask you: How's the construction going?
No way. I had workers from western Ukraine working for me, but they wouldn't let them in.
The house is still standing without a roof... It is sad.
With windows, but without a roof.